Breachsense alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Breachsense is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 52.7 out of 100, ranking 12th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 52.7 / 100 · 12th of 100
- Infostealer
- 69.0 / 100 · 8th of 35
- Third-party risk
- 4 / 10 · 25th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 8 / 10 · 19th of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · 68th of 98
- API
- 10 / 10 · Public documentation (/documentation)
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- The Infostealer Index 2026
- Website scanned
- breachsense.com
- Country information source
- Country information sources: CB Insights and BuiltIn.
Breachsense score profile
- Infostealer
- 69.0 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- 4 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 8 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 10 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Breachsense ranks 12th among 100 providers with an overall score of 52.7, placing it in the top quarter. The next score up belongs to Constella Intelligence (52.8, 0.1 points higher). The next score down belongs to Flashpoint (50.2, 2.5 points lower).
Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 11th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 19.6 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 7th; the closest scores in that list belong to Constella Intelligence (52.8) and Flashpoint (50.2).
Of its overall score of 52.7, 29.1 points come from infostealer, 18.3 from the four product categories and 5.3 from the API score; the largest share, 55%, comes from the infostealer score. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.
Its infostealer score is 69.0, ranking 8th among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in Infostealer focus (8 / 10; ranked 4th). Its lowest is in free access (4 / 10; ranked 14th). It is above the average on 5 of the seven criteria.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 2 of the four product categories: third-party risk and phishing and brand protection. Its strongest category relative to the average is phishing and brand protection: 8 / 10 against an average of 3.7. It falls furthest below the average in attack surface management: 2 / 10 against 4.9. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 19th, shared with 8 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to WhiteIntel: overall score 45.4, with the same score in 1 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- Infostealer score 69.0; 7 providers score higher in this category.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in executive protection.
- Third-party risk: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- Phishing and brand protection: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Breachsense’s strongest categories (infostealer and phishing and brand protection): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Breachsense.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- SOCRadar63.1
- Check Point (Cyberint)58.8
- ThreatMon55.9
- Constella Intelligence52.8
- Breachsense52.7
- Flashpoint50.2
- WhiteIntel45.4
- CybelAngel44.6
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 41.3 points above Breachsense). Scores higher than Breachsense in infostealer (98.2 vs Breachsense 69.0), third-party risk (9 vs Breachsense 4), phishing and brand protection (9 vs Breachsense 8), executive protection (9 vs Breachsense 0) and attack surface management (9 vs Breachsense 2).
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 19.6 points above Breachsense). Scores higher than Breachsense in third-party risk (10 vs Breachsense 4), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Breachsense 8), executive protection (8 vs Breachsense 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Breachsense 2). Scores lower in infostealer (46.7 vs Breachsense 69.0).
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 17.2 points above Breachsense). Scores higher than Breachsense in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Breachsense 8), executive protection (10 vs Breachsense 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Breachsense 2). Scores lower in infostealer (66.1 vs Breachsense 69.0) and third-party risk (0 vs Breachsense 4).
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
SOCRadar
Overall score 63.1 (7th; 10.4 points above Breachsense). Scores higher than Breachsense in infostealer (71.7 vs Breachsense 69.0), third-party risk (5 vs Breachsense 4), executive protection (8 vs Breachsense 0) and attack surface management (5 vs Breachsense 2). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (5 vs Breachsense 8). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: socradar.io
- 5
Check Point (Cyberint)
Overall score 58.8 (8th; 6.1 points above Breachsense). Scores higher than Breachsense in third-party risk (8 vs Breachsense 4), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Breachsense 8) and attack surface management (8 vs Breachsense 2). Scores lower in infostealer (52.1 vs Breachsense 69.0). API: behind a login or contract.
Israel · Website scanned: cyberint.com
- 6
ThreatMon
Overall score 55.9 (9th; 3.2 points above Breachsense). Scores higher than Breachsense in third-party risk (6 vs Breachsense 4), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Breachsense 8), executive protection (8 vs Breachsense 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Breachsense 2). Scores lower in infostealer (39.0 vs Breachsense 69.0). API: behind a login or contract.
Türkiye · Website scanned: threatmon.io
- 7
Constella Intelligence
Overall score 52.8 (11th; 0.1 points above Breachsense). Scores higher than Breachsense in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Breachsense 8) and executive protection (6 vs Breachsense 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs Breachsense 4) and attack surface management (0 vs Breachsense 2). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: constella.ai
- 8
Flashpoint
Overall score 50.2 (13th; 2.5 points below Breachsense). Scores higher than Breachsense in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Breachsense 8), executive protection (2 vs Breachsense 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Breachsense 2). Scores lower in infostealer (63.0 vs Breachsense 69.0) and third-party risk (0 vs Breachsense 4). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: flashpoint.io
- 9
WhiteIntel
Overall score 45.4 (17th; 7.3 points below Breachsense). Scores higher than Breachsense in third-party risk (6 vs Breachsense 4). Scores lower in infostealer (57.9 vs Breachsense 69.0), phishing and brand protection (6 vs Breachsense 8) and attack surface management (0 vs Breachsense 2).
Türkiye · Website scanned: whiteintel.io
- 10
CybelAngel
Overall score 44.6 (20th; 8.1 points below Breachsense). Scores higher than Breachsense in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Breachsense 8) and attack surface management (4 vs Breachsense 2). Scores lower in infostealer (49.6 vs Breachsense 69.0) and third-party risk (0 vs Breachsense 4).
France · Website scanned: cybelangel.com
Breachsense vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | Breachsense | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.7 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 12th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | 69.0 | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 8 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 6 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 8 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 8 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 8 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | 6 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | 4 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 4 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 8 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 2 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | The Infostealer Index 2026 | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.