Dark Radar alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Dark Radar is a provider headquartered in Türkiye and was included in this comparison through Türkiye-linked providers. Its overall score is 94.0 out of 100, ranking 1st among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 94.0 / 100 · 1st of 100
- Infostealer
- 98.2 / 100 · 1st of 35
- Third-party risk
- 9 / 10 · 5th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 9 / 10 · 18th of 98
- Executive protection
- 9 / 10 · 6th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 9 / 10 · 15th of 98
- API
- 10 / 10 · Public documentation
- Country
- Türkiye
- Selection source
- Türkiye-linked providers
- Website scanned
- darkradar.com
- Recorded during scanning
- This assessment is based on Dark Radar product catalogues and the supplier report available in the platform (ransomware, breach and attack surface categories).
- Assessment note
- Surface adequacy was additionally assessed in this scoring. The session cookie and free access scores are based on the session cookies shown in leak records and the free plan (darkradar.com/en/pricing). The published research score is based on the global, Türkiye and Azerbaijan monthly infostealer reports, malware profiles and case studies published since January 2026 (darkradar.com/en/reports).
Dark Radar score profile
- Infostealer
- 98.2 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- 9 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 9 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 9 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 9 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 10 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Dark Radar ranks first among 100 providers with an overall score of 94.0. The next score down belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3, 21.7 points lower).
Among the 24 providers selected through the same source (Türkiye-linked providers), it ranks 1st. It holds the highest overall score in this group; the next score in the group belongs to Brandefense (50.0). Among the 23 providers headquartered in Türkiye it ranks 1st; the closest scores in that list belong to ThreatMon (55.9) and Brandefense (50.0).
Of its overall score of 94.0, 41.3 points come from infostealer, 47.4 from the four product categories and 5.3 from the API score; the largest share, 50%, comes from the four product categories. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.
Its infostealer score is 98.2, ranking 1st among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in device-level infection details (10 / 10; ranked 1st). Its lowest is in Infostealer focus (9 / 10; ranked 2nd). It is above the average on all seven criteria.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in all four product categories. Its strongest category relative to the average is executive protection: 9 / 10 against an average of 1.6. Its best category rank is in third-party risk: 5th.
Its score distribution is closest to Bitsight (Cybersixgill): overall score 72.3, with the same score in 0 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- Third-party risk: 9 / 10.
- Phishing and brand protection: 9 / 10.
- Executive protection: 9 / 10.
- Attack surface management: 9 / 10.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Dark Radar’s strongest categories (infostealer, third-party risk, phishing and brand protection, executive protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Dark Radar.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- Flare65.8
- Cyble64.8
- Recorded Future63.3
- SOCRadar63.1
- Check Point (Cyberint)58.8
- ThreatMon55.9
- Breachsense52.7
- Flashpoint50.2
- 1
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 21.7 points below Dark Radar). Scores higher than Dark Radar in third-party risk (10 vs Dark Radar 9) and phishing and brand protection (10 vs Dark Radar 9). Scores lower in infostealer (46.7 vs Dark Radar 98.2), executive protection (8 vs Dark Radar 9) and attack surface management (8 vs Dark Radar 9).
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 2
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 24.1 points below Dark Radar). Scores higher than Dark Radar in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Dark Radar 9) and executive protection (10 vs Dark Radar 9). Scores lower in infostealer (66.1 vs Dark Radar 98.2), third-party risk (0 vs Dark Radar 9) and attack surface management (8 vs Dark Radar 9).
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 3
Flare
Overall score 65.8 (4th; 28.2 points below Dark Radar). Scores lower in infostealer (81.2 vs Dark Radar 98.2), third-party risk (4 vs Dark Radar 9), phishing and brand protection (8 vs Dark Radar 9), executive protection (8 vs Dark Radar 9) and attack surface management (0 vs Dark Radar 9).
Canada · Website scanned: flare.io
- 4
Cyble
Overall score 64.8 (5th; 29.2 points below Dark Radar). Scores higher than Dark Radar in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Dark Radar 9) and executive protection (10 vs Dark Radar 9). Scores lower in infostealer (47.7 vs Dark Radar 98.2), third-party risk (4 vs Dark Radar 9) and attack surface management (8 vs Dark Radar 9). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: cyble.com
- 5
Recorded Future
Overall score 63.3 (6th; 30.7 points below Dark Radar). Scores higher than Dark Radar in third-party risk (10 vs Dark Radar 9). Scores lower in infostealer (69.0 vs Dark Radar 98.2), phishing and brand protection (6 vs Dark Radar 9), executive protection (0 vs Dark Radar 9) and attack surface management (6 vs Dark Radar 9).
United States · Website scanned: recordedfuture.com
- 6
SOCRadar
Overall score 63.1 (7th; 30.9 points below Dark Radar). Scores lower in infostealer (71.7 vs Dark Radar 98.2), third-party risk (5 vs Dark Radar 9), phishing and brand protection (5 vs Dark Radar 9), executive protection (8 vs Dark Radar 9) and attack surface management (5 vs Dark Radar 9). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: socradar.io
- 7
Check Point (Cyberint)
Overall score 58.8 (8th; 35.2 points below Dark Radar). Scores higher than Dark Radar in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Dark Radar 9). Scores lower in infostealer (52.1 vs Dark Radar 98.2), third-party risk (8 vs Dark Radar 9), executive protection (0 vs Dark Radar 9) and attack surface management (8 vs Dark Radar 9). API: behind a login or contract.
Israel · Website scanned: cyberint.com
- 8
ThreatMon
Overall score 55.9 (9th; 38.1 points below Dark Radar). Scores higher than Dark Radar in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Dark Radar 9). Scores lower in infostealer (39.0 vs Dark Radar 98.2), third-party risk (6 vs Dark Radar 9), executive protection (8 vs Dark Radar 9) and attack surface management (4 vs Dark Radar 9). API: behind a login or contract.
Türkiye · Website scanned: threatmon.io
- 9
Breachsense
Overall score 52.7 (12th; 41.3 points below Dark Radar). Scores lower in infostealer (69.0 vs Dark Radar 98.2), third-party risk (4 vs Dark Radar 9), phishing and brand protection (8 vs Dark Radar 9), executive protection (0 vs Dark Radar 9) and attack surface management (2 vs Dark Radar 9).
United States · Website scanned: breachsense.com
- 10
Flashpoint
Overall score 50.2 (13th; 43.8 points below Dark Radar). Scores higher than Dark Radar in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Dark Radar 9). Scores lower in infostealer (63.0 vs Dark Radar 98.2), third-party risk (0 vs Dark Radar 9), executive protection (2 vs Dark Radar 9) and attack surface management (4 vs Dark Radar 9). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: flashpoint.io
Dark Radar vs Bitsight (Cybersixgill), NordStellar and Flare
| Criterion | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar | Flare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 | 65.8 |
| Overall rank | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th |
| Infostealer score | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 | 81.2 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 9 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 10 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 10 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 10 | 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 10 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| Published research (10%) | 10 | 7 | 6 | 9 |
| Free access (10%) | 10 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Third-party risk | 9 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 9 | 10 | 10 | 8 |
| Executive protection | 9 | 8 | 10 | 8 |
| Attack surface management | 9 | 8 | 8 | 0 |
| API | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania | Canada |
| Selection source | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.