Brandefense alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Brandefense is a provider headquartered in Türkiye and was included in this comparison through Türkiye-linked providers. Its overall score is 50.0 out of 100, ranking 14th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 50.0 / 100 · 14th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 8 / 10 · 6th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- Executive protection
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- Attack surface management
- 8 / 10 · 16th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
- Country
- Türkiye
- Selection source
- Türkiye-linked providers
- Website scanned
- brandefense.io
- Recorded during scanning
- /digital-risk-protection, /phishing-monitoring-domain-abuse, /third-party-risk-management, /executive-protection, /external-attack-surface-management.
Brandefense score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 8 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 10 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 8 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Brandefense ranks 14th among 100 providers with an overall score of 50.0, placing it in the top quarter. It shares the same overall score with Deepinfo. The next score up belongs to Flashpoint (50.2, 0.2 points higher). The next score down belongs to Hudson Rock (49.0, 1.0 points lower).
Among the 24 providers selected through the same source (Türkiye-linked providers), it ranks 2nd. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Dark Radar (94.0), 44.0 points above. Among the 23 providers headquartered in Türkiye it ranks 3rd; the closest scores in that list belong to ThreatMon (55.9) and Deepinfo (50.0).
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 50.0, 47.4 points come from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in all four product categories. Its strongest category relative to the average is executive protection: 10 / 10 against an average of 1.6. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 1st, shared with 16 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to these 2 providers: Deepinfo and Styx Intelligence; the first has an overall score of 50.0, with the same score in 3 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- Third-party risk: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Brandefense’s strongest categories (third-party risk, phishing and brand protection, executive protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Brandefense.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- Cyble64.8
- SOCRadar63.1
- ThreatMon55.9
- Brandefense50.0
- Deepinfo50.0
- ImmuniWeb44.7
- Styx Intelligence44.7
- CTM36042.1
- ZeroFox39.5
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 44.0 points above Brandefense). Scores higher than Brandefense in third-party risk (9 vs Brandefense 8) and attack surface management (9 vs Brandefense 8). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (9 vs Brandefense 10) and executive protection (9 vs Brandefense 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 22.3 points above Brandefense). Scores higher than Brandefense in third-party risk (10 vs Brandefense 8). Scores lower in executive protection (8 vs Brandefense 10). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
Cyble
Overall score 64.8 (5th; 14.8 points above Brandefense). Scores lower in third-party risk (4 vs Brandefense 8).
United States · Website scanned: cyble.com
- 4
SOCRadar
Overall score 63.1 (7th; 13.1 points above Brandefense). Scores lower in third-party risk (5 vs Brandefense 8), phishing and brand protection (5 vs Brandefense 10), executive protection (8 vs Brandefense 10) and attack surface management (5 vs Brandefense 8).
United States · Website scanned: socradar.io
- 5
ThreatMon
Overall score 55.9 (9th; 5.9 points above Brandefense). Scores lower in third-party risk (6 vs Brandefense 8), executive protection (8 vs Brandefense 10) and attack surface management (4 vs Brandefense 8).
Türkiye · Website scanned: threatmon.io
- 6
Deepinfo
Overall score 50.0 (14th; same as Brandefense). Scores lower in executive protection (8 vs Brandefense 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: deepinfo.com
- 7
ImmuniWeb
Overall score 44.7 (18th; 5.3 points below Brandefense). Scores higher than Brandefense in third-party risk (10 vs Brandefense 8) and attack surface management (10 vs Brandefense 8). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Brandefense 10) and executive protection (2 vs Brandefense 10). API: public documentation.
Switzerland · Website scanned: immuniweb.com
- 8
Styx Intelligence
Overall score 44.7 (18th; 5.3 points below Brandefense). Scores lower in attack surface management (6 vs Brandefense 8). API: no documentation found.
Canada · Website scanned: styxintel.com
- 9
CTM360
Overall score 42.1 (21st; 7.9 points below Brandefense). Scores lower in executive protection (4 vs Brandefense 10).
Bahrain · Website scanned: ctm360.com
- 10
ZeroFox
Overall score 39.5 (23rd; 10.5 points below Brandefense). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (4 vs Brandefense 10) and attack surface management (6 vs Brandefense 8).
United States · Website scanned: zerofox.com
Brandefense vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and Cyble
| Criterion | Brandefense | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | Cyble |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.0 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 64.8 |
| Overall rank | 14th | 1st | 2nd | 5th |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 47.7 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 4 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 3 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 3 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 8 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 8 | 9 | 10 | 4 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 10 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 5 |
| Country | Türkiye | Türkiye | United States | United States |
| Selection source | Türkiye-linked providers | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.