CTM360 alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
CTM360 is a provider headquartered in Bahrain and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence. Its overall score is 42.1 out of 100, ranking 21st among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 42.1 / 100 · 21st of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 8 / 10 · 6th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- Executive protection
- 4 / 10 · 15th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 8 / 10 · 16th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
- Country
- Bahrain
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence
- Website scanned
- ctm360.com
- Country information source
- Country information was determined based on the office address stated on the provider’s website.
CTM360 score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 8 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 4 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 8 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
CTM360 ranks 21st among 100 providers with an overall score of 42.1, placing it in the top quarter. The next score up belongs to CybelAngel (44.6, 2.5 points higher). The next score down belongs to Outpost24 Threat Compass (39.7, 2.4 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 3rd. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 2.6 points above. It is the only provider in the comparison headquartered in Bahrain.
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 42.1, 39.5 points come from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in all four product categories. Its strongest category relative to the average is phishing and brand protection: 10 / 10 against an average of 3.7. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 1st, shared with 16 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to Brandefense: overall score 50.0, with the same score in 3 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- Third-party risk: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- Executive protection: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in CTM360’s strongest categories (third-party risk, phishing and brand protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to CTM360.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- Cyble64.8
- Brandefense50.0
- Deepinfo50.0
- ImmuniWeb44.7
- Styx Intelligence44.7
- CTM36042.1
- ZeroFox39.5
- RiskProfiler36.8
- UpGuard36.8
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 51.9 points above CTM360). Scores higher than CTM360 in third-party risk (9 vs CTM360 8), executive protection (9 vs CTM360 4) and attack surface management (9 vs CTM360 8). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (9 vs CTM360 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 30.2 points above CTM360). Scores higher than CTM360 in third-party risk (10 vs CTM360 8) and executive protection (8 vs CTM360 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
Cyble
Overall score 64.8 (5th; 22.7 points above CTM360). Scores higher than CTM360 in executive protection (10 vs CTM360 4). Scores lower in third-party risk (4 vs CTM360 8).
United States · Website scanned: cyble.com
- 4
Brandefense
Overall score 50.0 (14th; 7.9 points above CTM360). Scores higher than CTM360 in executive protection (10 vs CTM360 4).
Türkiye · Website scanned: brandefense.io
- 5
Deepinfo
Overall score 50.0 (14th; 7.9 points above CTM360). Scores higher than CTM360 in executive protection (8 vs CTM360 4). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: deepinfo.com
- 6
ImmuniWeb
Overall score 44.7 (18th; 2.6 points above CTM360). Scores higher than CTM360 in third-party risk (10 vs CTM360 8) and attack surface management (10 vs CTM360 8). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs CTM360 10) and executive protection (2 vs CTM360 4). API: public documentation.
Switzerland · Website scanned: immuniweb.com
- 7
Styx Intelligence
Overall score 44.7 (18th; 2.6 points above CTM360). Scores higher than CTM360 in executive protection (10 vs CTM360 4). Scores lower in attack surface management (6 vs CTM360 8). API: no documentation found.
Canada · Website scanned: styxintel.com
- 8
ZeroFox
Overall score 39.5 (23rd; 2.6 points below CTM360). Scores higher than CTM360 in executive protection (10 vs CTM360 4). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (4 vs CTM360 10) and attack surface management (6 vs CTM360 8).
United States · Website scanned: zerofox.com
- 9
RiskProfiler
Overall score 36.8 (26th; 5.3 points below CTM360). Scores higher than CTM360 in attack surface management (10 vs CTM360 8). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs CTM360 10) and executive protection (2 vs CTM360 4). API: no documentation found.
United States · Website scanned: riskprofiler.io
- 10
UpGuard
Overall score 36.8 (26th; 5.3 points below CTM360). Scores lower in third-party risk (6 vs CTM360 8) and executive protection (0 vs CTM360 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: upguard.com
CTM360 vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and Cyble
| Criterion | CTM360 | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | Cyble |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.1 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 64.8 |
| Overall rank | 21st | 1st | 2nd | 5th |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 47.7 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 4 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 3 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 3 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 8 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 8 | 9 | 10 | 4 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 4 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 5 |
| Country | Bahrain | Türkiye | United States | United States |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.