RiskProfiler alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
RiskProfiler is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence and attack surface. Its overall score is 36.8 out of 100, ranking 26th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 36.8 / 100 · 26th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 8 / 10 · 6th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 8 / 10 · 19th of 98
- Executive protection
- 2 / 10 · 19th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- API
- 0 / 10 · No documentation found
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence and attack surface
- Website scanned
- riskprofiler.io
- Country information source
- Country information source: VCBacked (single source).
RiskProfiler score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 8 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 8 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 2 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 10 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 0 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
RiskProfiler ranks 26th among 100 providers with an overall score of 36.8, placing it in the top half. It shares the same overall score with UpGuard. The next score up belongs to Lunar (Webz.io) (37.8, 1.0 points higher). The next score down belongs to Group-IB (36.6, 0.2 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 6th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 7.9 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 10th; the closest scores in that list belong to ZeroFox (39.5) and UpGuard (36.8).
Because it is not in the index and no API documentation was found, its entire overall score of 36.8 comes from the four product categories. It is one of 30 providers for which no API documentation was found.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in all four product categories. Its strongest category relative to the average is third-party risk: 8 / 10 against an average of 2.8. Its best category rank is in attack surface management: 1st, shared with 13 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to Foresiet: overall score 31.6, with the same score in 3 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- Third-party risk: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- Phishing and brand protection: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- Executive protection: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- No API documentation was found on the website or in search results.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in RiskProfiler’s strongest categories (third-party risk, phishing and brand protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to RiskProfiler.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- Cyble64.8
- CTM36042.1
- ZeroFox39.5
- RiskProfiler36.8
- UpGuard36.8
- ThreatBook34.2
- Black Kite31.6
- Panorays31.6
- Foresiet31.6
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 57.2 points above RiskProfiler). Scores higher than RiskProfiler in third-party risk (9 vs RiskProfiler 8), phishing and brand protection (9 vs RiskProfiler 8) and executive protection (9 vs RiskProfiler 2). Scores lower in attack surface management (9 vs RiskProfiler 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 35.5 points above RiskProfiler). Scores higher than RiskProfiler in third-party risk (10 vs RiskProfiler 8), phishing and brand protection (10 vs RiskProfiler 8) and executive protection (8 vs RiskProfiler 2). Scores lower in attack surface management (8 vs RiskProfiler 10). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
Cyble
Overall score 64.8 (5th; 28.0 points above RiskProfiler). Scores higher than RiskProfiler in phishing and brand protection (10 vs RiskProfiler 8) and executive protection (10 vs RiskProfiler 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (4 vs RiskProfiler 8) and attack surface management (8 vs RiskProfiler 10). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: cyble.com
- 4
CTM360
Overall score 42.1 (21st; 5.3 points above RiskProfiler). Scores higher than RiskProfiler in phishing and brand protection (10 vs RiskProfiler 8) and executive protection (4 vs RiskProfiler 2). Scores lower in attack surface management (8 vs RiskProfiler 10). API: behind a login or contract.
Bahrain · Website scanned: ctm360.com
- 5
ZeroFox
Overall score 39.5 (23rd; 2.7 points above RiskProfiler). Scores higher than RiskProfiler in executive protection (10 vs RiskProfiler 2). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (4 vs RiskProfiler 8) and attack surface management (6 vs RiskProfiler 10). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: zerofox.com
- 6
UpGuard
Overall score 36.8 (26th; same as RiskProfiler). Scores higher than RiskProfiler in phishing and brand protection (10 vs RiskProfiler 8). Scores lower in third-party risk (6 vs RiskProfiler 8), executive protection (0 vs RiskProfiler 2) and attack surface management (8 vs RiskProfiler 10). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: upguard.com
- 7
ThreatBook
Overall score 34.2 (30th; 2.6 points below RiskProfiler). Scores higher than RiskProfiler in phishing and brand protection (10 vs RiskProfiler 8). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs RiskProfiler 8) and executive protection (0 vs RiskProfiler 2). API: public documentation.
China · Website scanned: threatbook.io
- 8
Black Kite
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 5.2 points below RiskProfiler). Scores higher than RiskProfiler in third-party risk (10 vs RiskProfiler 8). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs RiskProfiler 8) and executive protection (0 vs RiskProfiler 2). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: blackkite.com
- 9
Panorays
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 5.2 points below RiskProfiler). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs RiskProfiler 8) and executive protection (0 vs RiskProfiler 2). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: panorays.com
- 10
Foresiet
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 5.2 points below RiskProfiler). Scores lower in attack surface management (6 vs RiskProfiler 10).
India · Website scanned: foresiet.com
RiskProfiler vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and Cyble
| Criterion | RiskProfiler | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | Cyble |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.8 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 64.8 |
| Overall rank | 26th | 1st | 2nd | 5th |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 47.7 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 4 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 3 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 3 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 8 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 8 | 9 | 10 | 4 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 8 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 2 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 0 | 10 | 10 | 5 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | United States |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence and attack surface | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.