Axur alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Axur is a provider headquartered in Brazil and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence. Its overall score is 39.5 out of 100, ranking 23rd among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 39.5 / 100 · 23rd of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- Executive protection
- 8 / 10 · 7th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
- Country
- Brazil
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence
- Website scanned
- axur.com
Axur score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 8 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 10 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Axur ranks 23rd among 100 providers with an overall score of 39.5, placing it in the top quarter. It shares the same overall score with ZeroFox. The next score up belongs to Outpost24 Threat Compass (39.7, 0.2 points higher). The next score down belongs to Lunar (Webz.io) (37.8, 1.7 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 4th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 5.2 points above. It is the only provider in the comparison headquartered in Brazil.
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 39.5, 36.9 points come from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 3 of the four product categories: phishing and brand protection, executive protection and attack surface management. Its strongest category relative to the average is executive protection: 8 / 10 against an average of 1.6. It falls furthest below the average in third-party risk: 0 / 10 against 2.8. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 1st, shared with 16 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to Cyble: overall score 64.8, with the same score in 1 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk.
- Executive protection: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Axur’s strongest categories (phishing and brand protection, executive protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Axur.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- ImmuniWeb44.7
- Styx Intelligence44.7
- CTM36042.1
- Axur39.5
- ZeroFox39.5
- RiskProfiler36.8
- Resecurity33.1
- Foresiet31.6
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 54.5 points above Axur). Scores higher than Axur in third-party risk (9 vs Axur 0) and executive protection (9 vs Axur 8). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (9 vs Axur 10) and attack surface management (9 vs Axur 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 32.8 points above Axur). Scores higher than Axur in third-party risk (10 vs Axur 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (8 vs Axur 10). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 30.4 points above Axur). Scores higher than Axur in executive protection (10 vs Axur 8). Scores lower in attack surface management (8 vs Axur 10). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
ImmuniWeb
Overall score 44.7 (18th; 5.2 points above Axur). Scores higher than Axur in third-party risk (10 vs Axur 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Axur 10) and executive protection (2 vs Axur 8). API: public documentation.
Switzerland · Website scanned: immuniweb.com
- 5
Styx Intelligence
Overall score 44.7 (18th; 5.2 points above Axur). Scores higher than Axur in third-party risk (8 vs Axur 0) and executive protection (10 vs Axur 8). Scores lower in attack surface management (6 vs Axur 10). API: no documentation found.
Canada · Website scanned: styxintel.com
- 6
CTM360
Overall score 42.1 (21st; 2.6 points above Axur). Scores higher than Axur in third-party risk (8 vs Axur 0). Scores lower in executive protection (4 vs Axur 8) and attack surface management (8 vs Axur 10).
Bahrain · Website scanned: ctm360.com
- 7
ZeroFox
Overall score 39.5 (23rd; same as Axur). Scores higher than Axur in third-party risk (8 vs Axur 0) and executive protection (10 vs Axur 8). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (4 vs Axur 10) and attack surface management (6 vs Axur 10).
United States · Website scanned: zerofox.com
- 8
RiskProfiler
Overall score 36.8 (26th; 2.7 points below Axur). Scores higher than Axur in third-party risk (8 vs Axur 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Axur 10) and executive protection (2 vs Axur 8). API: no documentation found.
United States · Website scanned: riskprofiler.io
- 9
Resecurity
Overall score 33.1 (31st; 6.4 points below Axur). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Axur 10), executive protection (2 vs Axur 8) and attack surface management (2 vs Axur 10).
United States · Website scanned: resecurity.com
- 10
Foresiet
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 7.9 points below Axur). Scores higher than Axur in third-party risk (8 vs Axur 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Axur 10), executive protection (2 vs Axur 8) and attack surface management (6 vs Axur 10). API: no documentation found.
India · Website scanned: foresiet.com
Axur vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | Axur | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.5 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 23rd | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 8 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Brazil | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.