DarkStrata alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
DarkStrata is a provider headquartered in the United Kingdom and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 34.5 out of 100, ranking 29th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 34.5 / 100 · 29th of 100
- Infostealer
- 44.5 / 100 · 24th of 35
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · 61st of 98
- Executive protection
- 8 / 10 · 7th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 0 / 10 · 81st of 98
- API
- 10 / 10 · Public documentation
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Selection source
- The Infostealer Index 2026
- Website scanned
- darkstrata.io
- Country information source
- Country information sources: G2 and the company website.
DarkStrata score profile
- Infostealer
- 44.5 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 8 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 0 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 10 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
DarkStrata ranks 29th among 100 providers with an overall score of 34.5, placing it in the top half. The next score up belongs to Group-IB (36.6, 2.1 points higher). The next score down belongs to ThreatBook (34.2, 0.3 points lower).
Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 19th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 37.8 points above. Among the 7 providers headquartered in the United Kingdom it ranks 1st; the closest scores in that list belong to Searchlight Cyber (29.8) and Orpheus Cyber (21.1).
Of its overall score of 34.5, 18.7 points come from infostealer, 10.5 from the four product categories and 5.3 from the API score; the largest share, 54%, comes from the infostealer score. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.
Its infostealer score is 44.5, ranking 24th among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in Infostealer focus (8 / 10; ranked 4th). Its lowest is in published research (2 / 10; ranked 31st). It is above the average on 1 of the seven criteria.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 1 of the four product categories: executive protection. Its strongest category relative to the average is executive protection: 8 / 10 against an average of 1.6. It falls furthest below the average in attack surface management: 0 / 10 against 4.9. Its best category rank is in executive protection: 7th, shared with 6 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to DarkOwl: overall score 26.7, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- Infostealer score 44.5; 23 providers score higher in this category.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk, phishing and brand protection and attack surface management.
- Executive protection: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in DarkStrata’s strongest categories (executive protection): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to DarkStrata.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- ZeroFox39.5
- Axur39.5
- Lunar (Webz.io)37.8
- RiskProfiler36.8
- DarkStrata34.5
- Resecurity33.1
- Foresiet31.6
- ECHO28.9
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 59.5 points above DarkStrata). Scores higher than DarkStrata in infostealer (98.2 vs DarkStrata 44.5), third-party risk (9 vs DarkStrata 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs DarkStrata 0), executive protection (9 vs DarkStrata 8) and attack surface management (9 vs DarkStrata 0).
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 37.8 points above DarkStrata). Scores higher than DarkStrata in infostealer (46.7 vs DarkStrata 44.5), third-party risk (10 vs DarkStrata 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs DarkStrata 0) and attack surface management (8 vs DarkStrata 0).
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 35.4 points above DarkStrata). Scores higher than DarkStrata in infostealer (66.1 vs DarkStrata 44.5), phishing and brand protection (10 vs DarkStrata 0), executive protection (10 vs DarkStrata 8) and attack surface management (8 vs DarkStrata 0).
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
ZeroFox
Overall score 39.5 (23rd; 5.0 points above DarkStrata). Scores higher than DarkStrata in third-party risk (8 vs DarkStrata 0), phishing and brand protection (4 vs DarkStrata 0), executive protection (10 vs DarkStrata 8) and attack surface management (6 vs DarkStrata 0). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: zerofox.com
- 5
Axur
Overall score 39.5 (23rd; 5.0 points above DarkStrata). Scores higher than DarkStrata in phishing and brand protection (10 vs DarkStrata 0) and attack surface management (10 vs DarkStrata 0). API: behind a login or contract.
Brazil · Website scanned: axur.com
- 6
Lunar (Webz.io)
Overall score 37.8 (25th; 3.3 points above DarkStrata). Scores higher than DarkStrata in infostealer (71.0 vs DarkStrata 44.5). Scores lower in executive protection (2 vs DarkStrata 8).
Israel · Website scanned: webz.io
- 7
RiskProfiler
Overall score 36.8 (26th; 2.3 points above DarkStrata). Scores higher than DarkStrata in third-party risk (8 vs DarkStrata 0), phishing and brand protection (8 vs DarkStrata 0) and attack surface management (10 vs DarkStrata 0). Scores lower in executive protection (2 vs DarkStrata 8). API: no documentation found.
United States · Website scanned: riskprofiler.io
- 8
Resecurity
Overall score 33.1 (31st; 1.4 points below DarkStrata). Scores higher than DarkStrata in phishing and brand protection (8 vs DarkStrata 0) and attack surface management (2 vs DarkStrata 0). Scores lower in infostealer (34.8 vs DarkStrata 44.5) and executive protection (2 vs DarkStrata 8). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: resecurity.com
- 9
Foresiet
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 2.9 points below DarkStrata). Scores higher than DarkStrata in third-party risk (8 vs DarkStrata 0), phishing and brand protection (8 vs DarkStrata 0) and attack surface management (6 vs DarkStrata 0). Scores lower in executive protection (2 vs DarkStrata 8). API: no documentation found.
India · Website scanned: foresiet.com
- 10
ECHO
Overall score 28.9 (37th; 5.6 points below DarkStrata). Scores higher than DarkStrata in third-party risk (2 vs DarkStrata 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs DarkStrata 0) and attack surface management (4 vs DarkStrata 0). Scores lower in executive protection (4 vs DarkStrata 8). API: behind a login or contract.
Türkiye · Website scanned: echocti.com
DarkStrata vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | DarkStrata | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.5 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 29th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | 44.5 | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 8 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 3 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 5 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 4 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 6 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | 2 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | 2 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 0 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 8 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 0 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | United Kingdom | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | The Infostealer Index 2026 | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.