KELA alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
KELA is a provider headquartered in Israel and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 31.7 out of 100, ranking 32nd among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 31.7 / 100 · 32nd of 100
- Infostealer
- 69.0 / 100 · 8th of 35
- Third-party risk
- Website could not be scanned
- Phishing and brand protection
- Website could not be scanned
- Executive protection
- Website could not be scanned
- Attack surface management
- Website could not be scanned
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract (docs redirect to login)
- Country
- Israel
- Selection source
- The Infostealer Index 2026
- Website scanned
- kelacyber.com
- Recorded during scanning
- kela.cyber refused automated access and ke-la.com did not respond; surfaces could not be scanned.
KELA score profile
- Infostealer
- 69.0 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- Website could not be scanned
- Phishing and brand protection
- Website could not be scanned
- Executive protection
- Website could not be scanned
- Attack surface management
- Website could not be scanned
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
KELA ranks 32nd among 100 providers with an overall score of 31.7, placing it in the top half. The next score up belongs to Resecurity (33.1, 1.4 points higher). The next score down belongs to Black Kite, Panorays and Foresiet (31.6, 0.1 points lower).
Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 21st. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 40.6 points above. Among the 7 providers headquartered in Israel it ranks 4th; the closest scores in that list belong to Lunar (Webz.io) (37.8) and IONIX (21.1).
Because its category scores could not be measured, its overall score of 31.7 consists only of the infostealer (29.1) and API (2.6) contributions. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract (docs redirect to login).
Its infostealer score is 69.0, ranking 8th among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in published research (9 / 10; ranked 3rd). Its lowest is in free access (4 / 10; ranked 14th). It is above the average on 6 of the seven criteria.
The other provider whose category scores could not be measured is CloudSEK (overall score 24.0).
Why look for alternatives
- Infostealer score 69.0; 7 providers score higher in this category.
- The website could not be opened during automated scanning, so category scores could not be measured.
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in KELA’s strongest categories (infostealer): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to KELA.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- Lunar (Webz.io)37.8
- Group-IB36.6
- DarkStrata34.5
- Resecurity33.1
- KELA31.7
- Searchlight Cyber29.8
- DarkOwl26.7
- Have I Been Pwned24.7
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 62.3 points above KELA). Scores higher than KELA in infostealer (98.2 vs KELA 69.0). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 40.6 points above KELA). Scores lower in infostealer (46.7 vs KELA 69.0). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 38.2 points above KELA). Scores lower in infostealer (66.1 vs KELA 69.0). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
Lunar (Webz.io)
Overall score 37.8 (25th; 6.1 points above KELA). Scores higher than KELA in infostealer (71.0 vs KELA 69.0). API: public documentation.
Israel · Website scanned: webz.io
- 5
Group-IB
Overall score 36.6 (28th; 4.9 points above KELA). Scores lower in infostealer (49.4 vs KELA 69.0).
Singapore · Website scanned: group-ib.com
- 6
DarkStrata
Overall score 34.5 (29th; 2.8 points above KELA). Scores lower in infostealer (44.5 vs KELA 69.0). API: public documentation.
United Kingdom · Website scanned: darkstrata.io
- 7
Resecurity
Overall score 33.1 (31st; 1.4 points above KELA). Scores lower in infostealer (34.8 vs KELA 69.0).
United States · Website scanned: resecurity.com
- 8
Searchlight Cyber
Overall score 29.8 (36th; 1.9 points below KELA). Scores lower in infostealer (45.7 vs KELA 69.0).
United Kingdom · Website scanned: slcyber.io
- 9
DarkOwl
Overall score 26.7 (39th; 5.0 points below KELA). Scores lower in infostealer (38.3 vs KELA 69.0). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: darkowl.com
- 10
Have I Been Pwned
Overall score 24.7 (42nd; 7.0 points below KELA). Scores lower in infostealer (46.2 vs KELA 69.0). API: public documentation.
Australia · Website scanned: haveibeenpwned.com
KELA vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | KELA | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 31.7 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 32nd | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | 69.0 | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 6 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 6 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 8 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 8 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 8 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | 9 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | 4 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | – | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | – | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | – | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | – | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Israel | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | The Infostealer Index 2026 | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.