Cyble alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Cyble is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 64.8 out of 100, ranking 5th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 64.8 / 100 · 5th of 100
- Infostealer
- 47.7 / 100 · 18th of 35
- Third-party risk
- 4 / 10 · 25th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- Executive protection
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- Attack surface management
- 8 / 10 · 16th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- The Infostealer Index 2026
- Website scanned
- cyble.com
- Recorded during scanning
- No reference to account exposure, risk scoring or breaches was identified on the /solutions/third-party-risk-management page.
Cyble score profile
- Infostealer
- 47.7 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- 4 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 10 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 8 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Cyble ranks 5th among 100 providers with an overall score of 64.8, placing it in the top 10. The next score up belongs to Flare (65.8, 1.0 points higher). The next score down belongs to Recorded Future (63.3, 1.5 points lower).
Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 4th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 7.5 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 2nd; the closest scores in that list belong to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3) and Recorded Future (63.3).
Of its overall score of 64.8, 20.1 points come from infostealer, 42.1 from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score; the largest share, 65%, comes from the four product categories. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.
Its infostealer score is 47.7, ranking 18th among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in published research (8 / 10; ranked 8th). Its lowest is in employee, customer and supplier segmentation (3 / 10; ranked 26th). It is above the average on 2 of the seven criteria.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in all four product categories. Its strongest category relative to the average is executive protection: 10 / 10 against an average of 1.6. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 1st, shared with 16 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to ThreatMon: overall score 55.9, with the same score in 1 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- Infostealer score 47.7; 17 providers score higher in this category.
- Third-party risk: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Cyble’s strongest categories (phishing and brand protection, executive protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Cyble.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- Cyble64.8
- SOCRadar63.1
- ThreatMon55.9
- Flashpoint50.2
- Brandefense50.0
- Deepinfo50.0
- ImmuniWeb44.7
- Styx Intelligence44.7
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 29.2 points above Cyble). Scores higher than Cyble in infostealer (98.2 vs Cyble 47.7), third-party risk (9 vs Cyble 4) and attack surface management (9 vs Cyble 8). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (9 vs Cyble 10) and executive protection (9 vs Cyble 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 7.5 points above Cyble). Scores higher than Cyble in third-party risk (10 vs Cyble 4). Scores lower in infostealer (46.7 vs Cyble 47.7) and executive protection (8 vs Cyble 10). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 5.1 points above Cyble). Scores higher than Cyble in infostealer (66.1 vs Cyble 47.7). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs Cyble 4). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
SOCRadar
Overall score 63.1 (7th; 1.7 points below Cyble). Scores higher than Cyble in infostealer (71.7 vs Cyble 47.7) and third-party risk (5 vs Cyble 4). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (5 vs Cyble 10), executive protection (8 vs Cyble 10) and attack surface management (5 vs Cyble 8).
United States · Website scanned: socradar.io
- 5
ThreatMon
Overall score 55.9 (9th; 8.9 points below Cyble). Scores higher than Cyble in third-party risk (6 vs Cyble 4). Scores lower in infostealer (39.0 vs Cyble 47.7), executive protection (8 vs Cyble 10) and attack surface management (4 vs Cyble 8).
Türkiye · Website scanned: threatmon.io
- 6
Flashpoint
Overall score 50.2 (13th; 14.6 points below Cyble). Scores higher than Cyble in infostealer (63.0 vs Cyble 47.7). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs Cyble 4), executive protection (2 vs Cyble 10) and attack surface management (4 vs Cyble 8).
United States · Website scanned: flashpoint.io
- 7
Brandefense
Overall score 50.0 (14th; 14.8 points below Cyble). Scores higher than Cyble in third-party risk (8 vs Cyble 4).
Türkiye · Website scanned: brandefense.io
- 8
Deepinfo
Overall score 50.0 (14th; 14.8 points below Cyble). Scores higher than Cyble in third-party risk (8 vs Cyble 4). Scores lower in executive protection (8 vs Cyble 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: deepinfo.com
- 9
ImmuniWeb
Overall score 44.7 (18th; 20.1 points below Cyble). Scores higher than Cyble in third-party risk (10 vs Cyble 4) and attack surface management (10 vs Cyble 8). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Cyble 10) and executive protection (2 vs Cyble 10). API: public documentation.
Switzerland · Website scanned: immuniweb.com
- 10
Styx Intelligence
Overall score 44.7 (18th; 20.1 points below Cyble). Scores higher than Cyble in third-party risk (8 vs Cyble 4). Scores lower in attack surface management (6 vs Cyble 8). API: no documentation found.
Canada · Website scanned: styxintel.com
Cyble vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | Cyble | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.8 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 5th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | 47.7 | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 4 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 3 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 3 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | 8 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | 4 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 4 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 10 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | The Infostealer Index 2026 | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.