Skip to content

SpyCloud alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared

SpyCloud is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 53.5 out of 100, ranking 10th among 100 providers.

Published
Scanned
3–4 November 2026
Infostealer score source
The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
Overall score and rank
53.5 / 100 · 10th of 100
Infostealer
83.3 / 100 · 3rd of 35
Third-party risk
6 / 10 · 18th of 98
Phishing and brand protection
0 / 10 · 61st of 98
Executive protection
4 / 10 · 15th of 98
Attack surface management
0 / 10 · 81st of 98
API
10 / 10 · Public documentation
Country
United States
Selection source
The Infostealer Index 2026
Website scanned
spycloud.com
Recorded during scanning
/products/supply-chain-threat-protection, /use-case/vendor-risk-detection, /products/identity-guardians.

SpyCloud score profile

SpyCloud against the provider average
Infostealer
83.3 / 100 · average 53.8
Third-party risk
6 / 10 · average 2.8
Phishing and brand protection
0 / 10 · average 3.7
Executive protection
4 / 10 · average 1.6
Attack surface management
0 / 10 · average 4.9
API
10 / 10 · average 5.3

Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.

SpyCloud ranks 10th among 100 providers with an overall score of 53.5, placing it in the top 10. The next score up belongs to ThreatMon (55.9, 2.4 points higher). The next score down belongs to Constella Intelligence (52.8, 0.7 points lower).

Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 9th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 18.8 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 5th; the closest scores in that list belong to SOCRadar (63.1) and Constella Intelligence (52.8).

Of its overall score of 53.5, 35.1 points come from infostealer, 13.1 from the four product categories and 5.3 from the API score; the largest share, 66%, comes from the infostealer score. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.

Its infostealer score is 83.3, ranking 3rd among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in session cookie and token coverage (10 / 10; ranked 1st). Its lowest is in free access (4 / 10; ranked 14th). It is above the average on 6 of the seven criteria.

It scores above the average of 98 providers in 2 of the four product categories: third-party risk and executive protection. Its strongest category relative to the average is third-party risk: 6 / 10 against an average of 2.8. It falls furthest below the average in attack surface management: 0 / 10 against 4.9. Its best category rank is in executive protection: 15th, shared with 3 providers.

Its score distribution is closest to Hudson Rock: overall score 49.0, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.

Why look for alternatives

  • Infostealer score 83.3; 2 providers score higher in this category.
  • No capability was identified on the scanned pages in phishing and brand protection and attack surface management.
  • Third-party risk: 3 of five capabilities identified (6 / 10).
  • Executive protection: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).

10 closest alternatives

The list is drawn from providers that score in SpyCloud’s strongest categories (infostealer and third-party risk): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to SpyCloud.

Overall score: SpyCloud and its 10 alternatives
  1. Dark Radar94.0
  2. Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
  3. Flare65.8
  4. Recorded Future63.3
  5. SOCRadar63.1
  6. Check Point (Cyberint)58.8
  7. ThreatMon55.9
  8. SpyCloud53.5
  9. Breachsense52.7
  10. Hudson Rock49.0
  11. WhiteIntel45.4
  1. 1

    Dark Radar

    Overall score 94.0 (1st; 40.5 points above SpyCloud). Scores higher than SpyCloud in infostealer (98.2 vs SpyCloud 83.3), third-party risk (9 vs SpyCloud 6), phishing and brand protection (9 vs SpyCloud 0), executive protection (9 vs SpyCloud 4) and attack surface management (9 vs SpyCloud 0).

    Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com

  2. 2

    Bitsight (Cybersixgill)

    Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 18.8 points above SpyCloud). Scores higher than SpyCloud in third-party risk (10 vs SpyCloud 6), phishing and brand protection (10 vs SpyCloud 0), executive protection (8 vs SpyCloud 4) and attack surface management (8 vs SpyCloud 0). Scores lower in infostealer (46.7 vs SpyCloud 83.3).

    United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com

  3. 3

    Flare

    Overall score 65.8 (4th; 12.3 points above SpyCloud). Scores higher than SpyCloud in phishing and brand protection (8 vs SpyCloud 0) and executive protection (8 vs SpyCloud 4). Scores lower in infostealer (81.2 vs SpyCloud 83.3) and third-party risk (4 vs SpyCloud 6).

    Canada · Website scanned: flare.io

  4. 4

    Recorded Future

    Overall score 63.3 (6th; 9.8 points above SpyCloud). Scores higher than SpyCloud in third-party risk (10 vs SpyCloud 6), phishing and brand protection (6 vs SpyCloud 0) and attack surface management (6 vs SpyCloud 0). Scores lower in infostealer (69.0 vs SpyCloud 83.3) and executive protection (0 vs SpyCloud 4).

    United States · Website scanned: recordedfuture.com

  5. 5

    SOCRadar

    Overall score 63.1 (7th; 9.6 points above SpyCloud). Scores higher than SpyCloud in phishing and brand protection (5 vs SpyCloud 0), executive protection (8 vs SpyCloud 4) and attack surface management (5 vs SpyCloud 0). Scores lower in infostealer (71.7 vs SpyCloud 83.3) and third-party risk (5 vs SpyCloud 6). API: behind a login or contract.

    United States · Website scanned: socradar.io

  6. 6

    Check Point (Cyberint)

    Overall score 58.8 (8th; 5.3 points above SpyCloud). Scores higher than SpyCloud in third-party risk (8 vs SpyCloud 6), phishing and brand protection (10 vs SpyCloud 0) and attack surface management (8 vs SpyCloud 0). Scores lower in infostealer (52.1 vs SpyCloud 83.3) and executive protection (0 vs SpyCloud 4). API: behind a login or contract.

    Israel · Website scanned: cyberint.com

  7. 7

    ThreatMon

    Overall score 55.9 (9th; 2.4 points above SpyCloud). Scores higher than SpyCloud in phishing and brand protection (10 vs SpyCloud 0), executive protection (8 vs SpyCloud 4) and attack surface management (4 vs SpyCloud 0). Scores lower in infostealer (39.0 vs SpyCloud 83.3). API: behind a login or contract.

    Türkiye · Website scanned: threatmon.io

  8. 8

    Breachsense

    Overall score 52.7 (12th; 0.8 points below SpyCloud). Scores higher than SpyCloud in phishing and brand protection (8 vs SpyCloud 0) and attack surface management (2 vs SpyCloud 0). Scores lower in infostealer (69.0 vs SpyCloud 83.3), third-party risk (4 vs SpyCloud 6) and executive protection (0 vs SpyCloud 4).

    United States · Website scanned: breachsense.com

  9. 9

    Hudson Rock

    Overall score 49.0 (16th; 4.5 points below SpyCloud). Scores higher than SpyCloud in infostealer (97.6 vs SpyCloud 83.3). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs SpyCloud 6) and executive protection (0 vs SpyCloud 4).

    Israel · Website scanned: hudsonrock.com

  10. 10

    WhiteIntel

    Overall score 45.4 (17th; 8.1 points below SpyCloud). Scores higher than SpyCloud in phishing and brand protection (6 vs SpyCloud 0). Scores lower in infostealer (57.9 vs SpyCloud 83.3) and executive protection (0 vs SpyCloud 4).

    Türkiye · Website scanned: whiteintel.io

SpyCloud vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and Flare

CriterionSpyCloudDark RadarBitsight (Cybersixgill)Flare
Overall score53.594.072.365.8
Overall rank10th1st2nd4th
Infostealer score83.398.246.781.2
Infostealer focus (15%)9947
Device-level infection details (15%)81059
Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%)91048
Session cookie and token coverage (10%)101059
Collection timeliness (10%)91079
Published research (10%)91079
Free access (10%)41016
Third-party risk69104
Phishing and brand protection09108
Executive protection4988
Attack surface management0980
API10101010
CountryUnited StatesTürkiyeUnited StatesCanada
Selection sourceThe Infostealer Index 2026Türkiye-linked providersThe Infostealer Index 2026The Infostealer Index 2026

Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.

Related pages

This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.