Flashpoint alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Flashpoint is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 50.2 out of 100, ranking 13th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 50.2 / 100 · 13th of 100
- Infostealer
- 63.0 / 100 · 12th of 35
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- Executive protection
- 2 / 10 · 19th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · 44th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract (documentation behind login)
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- The Infostealer Index 2026
- Website scanned
- flashpoint.io
Flashpoint score profile
- Infostealer
- 63.0 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 2 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Flashpoint ranks 13th among 100 providers with an overall score of 50.2, placing it in the top quarter. The next score up belongs to Breachsense (52.7, 2.5 points higher). The next score down belongs to Brandefense and Deepinfo (50.0, 0.2 points lower).
Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 12th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 22.1 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 8th; the closest scores in that list belong to Breachsense (52.7) and ZeroFox (39.5).
Of its overall score of 50.2, 26.5 points come from infostealer, 21.1 from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score; the largest share, 53%, comes from the infostealer score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract (documentation behind login).
Its infostealer score is 63.0, ranking 12th among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in device-level infection details (8 / 10; ranked 6th). Its lowest is in free access (1 / 10; ranked 28th). It is above the average on 5 of the seven criteria.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 2 of the four product categories: phishing and brand protection and executive protection. Its strongest category relative to the average is phishing and brand protection: 10 / 10 against an average of 3.7. It falls furthest below the average in third-party risk: 0 / 10 against 2.8. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 1st, shared with 16 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to Group-IB: overall score 36.6, with the same score in 1 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- Infostealer score 63.0; 11 providers score higher in this category.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk.
- Executive protection: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Flashpoint’s strongest categories (infostealer and phishing and brand protection): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Flashpoint.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- Check Point (Cyberint)58.8
- ThreatMon55.9
- Constella Intelligence52.8
- Breachsense52.7
- Flashpoint50.2
- WhiteIntel45.4
- CybelAngel44.6
- Outpost24 Threat Compass39.7
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 43.8 points above Flashpoint). Scores higher than Flashpoint in infostealer (98.2 vs Flashpoint 63.0), third-party risk (9 vs Flashpoint 0), executive protection (9 vs Flashpoint 2) and attack surface management (9 vs Flashpoint 4). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (9 vs Flashpoint 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 22.1 points above Flashpoint). Scores higher than Flashpoint in third-party risk (10 vs Flashpoint 0), executive protection (8 vs Flashpoint 2) and attack surface management (8 vs Flashpoint 4). Scores lower in infostealer (46.7 vs Flashpoint 63.0). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 19.7 points above Flashpoint). Scores higher than Flashpoint in infostealer (66.1 vs Flashpoint 63.0), executive protection (10 vs Flashpoint 2) and attack surface management (8 vs Flashpoint 4). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
Check Point (Cyberint)
Overall score 58.8 (8th; 8.6 points above Flashpoint). Scores higher than Flashpoint in third-party risk (8 vs Flashpoint 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Flashpoint 4). Scores lower in infostealer (52.1 vs Flashpoint 63.0) and executive protection (0 vs Flashpoint 2).
Israel · Website scanned: cyberint.com
- 5
ThreatMon
Overall score 55.9 (9th; 5.7 points above Flashpoint). Scores higher than Flashpoint in third-party risk (6 vs Flashpoint 0) and executive protection (8 vs Flashpoint 2). Scores lower in infostealer (39.0 vs Flashpoint 63.0).
Türkiye · Website scanned: threatmon.io
- 6
Constella Intelligence
Overall score 52.8 (11th; 2.6 points above Flashpoint). Scores higher than Flashpoint in infostealer (69.1 vs Flashpoint 63.0) and executive protection (6 vs Flashpoint 2). Scores lower in attack surface management (0 vs Flashpoint 4).
United States · Website scanned: constella.ai
- 7
Breachsense
Overall score 52.7 (12th; 2.5 points above Flashpoint). Scores higher than Flashpoint in infostealer (69.0 vs Flashpoint 63.0) and third-party risk (4 vs Flashpoint 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Flashpoint 10), executive protection (0 vs Flashpoint 2) and attack surface management (2 vs Flashpoint 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: breachsense.com
- 8
WhiteIntel
Overall score 45.4 (17th; 4.8 points below Flashpoint). Scores higher than Flashpoint in third-party risk (6 vs Flashpoint 0). Scores lower in infostealer (57.9 vs Flashpoint 63.0), phishing and brand protection (6 vs Flashpoint 10), executive protection (0 vs Flashpoint 2) and attack surface management (0 vs Flashpoint 4). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: whiteintel.io
- 9
CybelAngel
Overall score 44.6 (20th; 5.6 points below Flashpoint). Scores lower in infostealer (49.6 vs Flashpoint 63.0) and executive protection (0 vs Flashpoint 2). API: public documentation.
France · Website scanned: cybelangel.com
- 10
Outpost24 Threat Compass
Overall score 39.7 (22nd; 10.5 points below Flashpoint). Scores higher than Flashpoint in attack surface management (6 vs Flashpoint 4). Scores lower in infostealer (50.6 vs Flashpoint 63.0), phishing and brand protection (6 vs Flashpoint 10) and executive protection (0 vs Flashpoint 2).
Sweden · Website scanned: outpost24.com
Flashpoint vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | Flashpoint | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.2 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 13th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | 63.0 | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 5 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 8 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 6 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 8 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 8 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | 8 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | 1 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 2 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 4 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | The Infostealer Index 2026 | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.