Outpost24 Threat Compass alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Outpost24 Threat Compass is a provider headquartered in Sweden and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 39.7 out of 100, ranking 22nd among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 39.7 / 100 · 22nd of 100
- Infostealer
- 50.6 / 100 · 15th of 35
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 6 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 6 / 10 · 35th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
- Country
- Sweden
- Selection source
- The Infostealer Index 2026
- Website scanned
- outpost24.com
Outpost24 Threat Compass score profile
- Infostealer
- 50.6 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 6 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 6 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Outpost24 Threat Compass ranks 22nd among 100 providers with an overall score of 39.7, placing it in the top quarter. The next score up belongs to CTM360 (42.1, 2.4 points higher). The next score down belongs to ZeroFox and Axur (39.5, 0.2 points lower).
Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 16th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 32.6 points above. Among the 2 providers headquartered in Sweden it ranks 1st; the closest scores in that list belong to Detectify (18.4).
Of its overall score of 39.7, 21.3 points come from infostealer, 15.8 from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score; the largest share, 54%, comes from the infostealer score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.
Its infostealer score is 50.6, ranking 15th among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in published research (8 / 10; ranked 8th). Its lowest is in session cookie and token coverage (2 / 10; ranked 22nd). It is above the average on 3 of the seven criteria.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 2 of the four product categories: phishing and brand protection and attack surface management. Its strongest category relative to the average is phishing and brand protection: 6 / 10 against an average of 3.7. It falls furthest below the average in third-party risk: 0 / 10 against 2.8. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 28th, shared with 5 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to Group-IB: overall score 36.6, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- Infostealer score 50.6; 14 providers score higher in this category.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk and executive protection.
- Phishing and brand protection: 3 of five capabilities identified (6 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 3 of five capabilities identified (6 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Outpost24 Threat Compass’s strongest categories (phishing and brand protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Outpost24 Threat Compass.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- CybelAngel44.6
- CTM36042.1
- Outpost24 Threat Compass39.7
- ZeroFox39.5
- Axur39.5
- RiskProfiler36.8
- UpGuard36.8
- Group-IB36.6
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 54.3 points above Outpost24 Threat Compass). Scores higher than Outpost24 Threat Compass in infostealer (98.2 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 50.6), third-party risk (9 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6), executive protection (9 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0) and attack surface management (9 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 32.6 points above Outpost24 Threat Compass). Scores higher than Outpost24 Threat Compass in third-party risk (10 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6), executive protection (8 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6). Scores lower in infostealer (46.7 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 50.6). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 30.2 points above Outpost24 Threat Compass). Scores higher than Outpost24 Threat Compass in infostealer (66.1 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 50.6), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6), executive protection (10 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
CybelAngel
Overall score 44.6 (20th; 4.9 points above Outpost24 Threat Compass). Scores higher than Outpost24 Threat Compass in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6). Scores lower in infostealer (49.6 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 50.6) and attack surface management (4 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6). API: public documentation.
France · Website scanned: cybelangel.com
- 5
CTM360
Overall score 42.1 (21st; 2.4 points above Outpost24 Threat Compass). Scores higher than Outpost24 Threat Compass in third-party risk (8 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6), executive protection (4 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6).
Bahrain · Website scanned: ctm360.com
- 6
ZeroFox
Overall score 39.5 (23rd; 0.2 points below Outpost24 Threat Compass). Scores higher than Outpost24 Threat Compass in third-party risk (8 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0) and executive protection (10 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (4 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6).
United States · Website scanned: zerofox.com
- 7
Axur
Overall score 39.5 (23rd; 0.2 points below Outpost24 Threat Compass). Scores higher than Outpost24 Threat Compass in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6), executive protection (8 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0) and attack surface management (10 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6).
Brazil · Website scanned: axur.com
- 8
RiskProfiler
Overall score 36.8 (26th; 2.9 points below Outpost24 Threat Compass). Scores higher than Outpost24 Threat Compass in third-party risk (8 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0), phishing and brand protection (8 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6), executive protection (2 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0) and attack surface management (10 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6). API: no documentation found.
United States · Website scanned: riskprofiler.io
- 9
UpGuard
Overall score 36.8 (26th; 2.9 points below Outpost24 Threat Compass). Scores higher than Outpost24 Threat Compass in third-party risk (6 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6) and attack surface management (8 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: upguard.com
- 10
Group-IB
Overall score 36.6 (28th; 3.1 points below Outpost24 Threat Compass). Scores higher than Outpost24 Threat Compass in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6). Scores lower in infostealer (49.4 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 50.6) and attack surface management (2 vs Outpost24 Threat Compass 6).
Singapore · Website scanned: group-ib.com
Outpost24 Threat Compass vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | Outpost24 Threat Compass | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.7 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 22nd | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | 50.6 | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 4 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 5 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 5 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 2 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | 8 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | 5 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 6 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 6 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Sweden | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | The Infostealer Index 2026 | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.