ZeroFox alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
ZeroFox is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence. Its overall score is 39.5 out of 100, ranking 23rd among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 39.5 / 100 · 23rd of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 8 / 10 · 6th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 4 / 10 · 35th of 98
- Executive protection
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- Attack surface management
- 6 / 10 · 35th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence
- Website scanned
- zerofox.com
ZeroFox score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 8 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 4 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 10 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 6 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
ZeroFox ranks 23rd among 100 providers with an overall score of 39.5, placing it in the top quarter. It shares the same overall score with Axur. The next score up belongs to Outpost24 Threat Compass (39.7, 0.2 points higher). The next score down belongs to Lunar (Webz.io) (37.8, 1.7 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 4th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 5.2 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 9th; the closest scores in that list belong to Flashpoint (50.2) and RiskProfiler (36.8).
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 39.5, 36.9 points come from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in all four product categories. Its strongest category relative to the average is executive protection: 10 / 10 against an average of 1.6. Its best category rank is in executive protection: 1st, shared with 4 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to Brandefense: overall score 50.0, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- Third-party risk: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- Phishing and brand protection: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 3 of five capabilities identified (6 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in ZeroFox’s strongest categories (third-party risk, executive protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to ZeroFox.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- Cyble64.8
- Brandefense50.0
- Deepinfo50.0
- ImmuniWeb44.7
- Styx Intelligence44.7
- CTM36042.1
- ZeroFox39.5
- RiskProfiler36.8
- Foresiet31.6
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 54.5 points above ZeroFox). Scores higher than ZeroFox in third-party risk (9 vs ZeroFox 8), phishing and brand protection (9 vs ZeroFox 4) and attack surface management (9 vs ZeroFox 6). Scores lower in executive protection (9 vs ZeroFox 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 32.8 points above ZeroFox). Scores higher than ZeroFox in third-party risk (10 vs ZeroFox 8), phishing and brand protection (10 vs ZeroFox 4) and attack surface management (8 vs ZeroFox 6). Scores lower in executive protection (8 vs ZeroFox 10). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
Cyble
Overall score 64.8 (5th; 25.3 points above ZeroFox). Scores higher than ZeroFox in phishing and brand protection (10 vs ZeroFox 4) and attack surface management (8 vs ZeroFox 6). Scores lower in third-party risk (4 vs ZeroFox 8).
United States · Website scanned: cyble.com
- 4
Brandefense
Overall score 50.0 (14th; 10.5 points above ZeroFox). Scores higher than ZeroFox in phishing and brand protection (10 vs ZeroFox 4) and attack surface management (8 vs ZeroFox 6).
Türkiye · Website scanned: brandefense.io
- 5
Deepinfo
Overall score 50.0 (14th; 10.5 points above ZeroFox). Scores higher than ZeroFox in phishing and brand protection (10 vs ZeroFox 4) and attack surface management (8 vs ZeroFox 6). Scores lower in executive protection (8 vs ZeroFox 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: deepinfo.com
- 6
ImmuniWeb
Overall score 44.7 (18th; 5.2 points above ZeroFox). Scores higher than ZeroFox in third-party risk (10 vs ZeroFox 8), phishing and brand protection (8 vs ZeroFox 4) and attack surface management (10 vs ZeroFox 6). Scores lower in executive protection (2 vs ZeroFox 10). API: public documentation.
Switzerland · Website scanned: immuniweb.com
- 7
Styx Intelligence
Overall score 44.7 (18th; 5.2 points above ZeroFox). Scores higher than ZeroFox in phishing and brand protection (10 vs ZeroFox 4). API: no documentation found.
Canada · Website scanned: styxintel.com
- 8
CTM360
Overall score 42.1 (21st; 2.6 points above ZeroFox). Scores higher than ZeroFox in phishing and brand protection (10 vs ZeroFox 4) and attack surface management (8 vs ZeroFox 6). Scores lower in executive protection (4 vs ZeroFox 10).
Bahrain · Website scanned: ctm360.com
- 9
RiskProfiler
Overall score 36.8 (26th; 2.7 points below ZeroFox). Scores higher than ZeroFox in phishing and brand protection (8 vs ZeroFox 4) and attack surface management (10 vs ZeroFox 6). Scores lower in executive protection (2 vs ZeroFox 10). API: no documentation found.
United States · Website scanned: riskprofiler.io
- 10
Foresiet
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 7.9 points below ZeroFox). Scores higher than ZeroFox in phishing and brand protection (8 vs ZeroFox 4). Scores lower in executive protection (2 vs ZeroFox 10). API: no documentation found.
India · Website scanned: foresiet.com
ZeroFox vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and Cyble
| Criterion | ZeroFox | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | Cyble |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.5 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 64.8 |
| Overall rank | 23rd | 1st | 2nd | 5th |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 47.7 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 4 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 3 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 3 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 8 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 8 | 9 | 10 | 4 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 4 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 10 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 6 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 5 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | United States |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.