SOCRadar alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
SOCRadar is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 63.1 out of 100, ranking 7th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 63.1 / 100 · 7th of 100
- Infostealer
- 71.7 / 100 · 5th of 35
- Third-party risk
- 5 / 10 · 24th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 5 / 10 · 34th of 98
- Executive protection
- 8 / 10 · 7th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 5 / 10 · 43rd of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- The Infostealer Index 2026
- Website scanned
- socradar.io
- Recorded during scanning
- No takedown request capability was identified on the product pages reviewed for executive protection.
- Country information source
- Country information sources: LinkedIn, Clutch and Built In.
- Assessment note
- Surface adequacy was additionally assessed in this scoring.
SOCRadar score profile
- Infostealer
- 71.7 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- 5 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 5 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 8 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 5 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
SOCRadar ranks 7th among 100 providers with an overall score of 63.1, placing it in the top 10. The next score up belongs to Recorded Future (63.3, 0.2 points higher). The next score down belongs to Check Point (Cyberint) (58.8, 4.3 points lower).
Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 6th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 9.2 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 4th; the closest scores in that list belong to Recorded Future (63.3) and SpyCloud (53.5).
Of its overall score of 63.1, 30.2 points come from infostealer, 30.3 from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score; the largest share, 48%, comes from the four product categories. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.
Its infostealer score is 71.7, ranking 5th among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in device-level infection details (9 / 10; ranked 3rd). Its lowest is in employee, customer and supplier segmentation (4 / 10; ranked 24th). It is above the average on 5 of the seven criteria.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in all four product categories. Its strongest category relative to the average is executive protection: 8 / 10 against an average of 1.6. Its best category rank is in executive protection: 7th, shared with 6 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to ThreatMon: overall score 55.9, with the same score in 1 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- Infostealer score 71.7; 4 providers score higher in this category.
- Third-party risk: 5 / 10.
- Phishing and brand protection: 5 / 10.
- Executive protection: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 5 / 10.
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in SOCRadar’s strongest categories (infostealer and executive protection): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to SOCRadar.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- Flare65.8
- Cyble64.8
- SOCRadar63.1
- ThreatMon55.9
- SpyCloud53.5
- Constella Intelligence52.8
- Flashpoint50.2
- Lunar (Webz.io)37.8
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 30.9 points above SOCRadar). Scores higher than SOCRadar in infostealer (98.2 vs SOCRadar 71.7), third-party risk (9 vs SOCRadar 5), phishing and brand protection (9 vs SOCRadar 5), executive protection (9 vs SOCRadar 8) and attack surface management (9 vs SOCRadar 5). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 9.2 points above SOCRadar). Scores higher than SOCRadar in third-party risk (10 vs SOCRadar 5), phishing and brand protection (10 vs SOCRadar 5) and attack surface management (8 vs SOCRadar 5). Scores lower in infostealer (46.7 vs SOCRadar 71.7). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 6.8 points above SOCRadar). Scores higher than SOCRadar in phishing and brand protection (10 vs SOCRadar 5), executive protection (10 vs SOCRadar 8) and attack surface management (8 vs SOCRadar 5). Scores lower in infostealer (66.1 vs SOCRadar 71.7) and third-party risk (0 vs SOCRadar 5). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
Flare
Overall score 65.8 (4th; 2.7 points above SOCRadar). Scores higher than SOCRadar in infostealer (81.2 vs SOCRadar 71.7) and phishing and brand protection (8 vs SOCRadar 5). Scores lower in third-party risk (4 vs SOCRadar 5) and attack surface management (0 vs SOCRadar 5). API: public documentation.
Canada · Website scanned: flare.io
- 5
Cyble
Overall score 64.8 (5th; 1.7 points above SOCRadar). Scores higher than SOCRadar in phishing and brand protection (10 vs SOCRadar 5), executive protection (10 vs SOCRadar 8) and attack surface management (8 vs SOCRadar 5). Scores lower in infostealer (47.7 vs SOCRadar 71.7) and third-party risk (4 vs SOCRadar 5).
United States · Website scanned: cyble.com
- 6
ThreatMon
Overall score 55.9 (9th; 7.2 points below SOCRadar). Scores higher than SOCRadar in third-party risk (6 vs SOCRadar 5) and phishing and brand protection (10 vs SOCRadar 5). Scores lower in infostealer (39.0 vs SOCRadar 71.7) and attack surface management (4 vs SOCRadar 5).
Türkiye · Website scanned: threatmon.io
- 7
SpyCloud
Overall score 53.5 (10th; 9.6 points below SOCRadar). Scores higher than SOCRadar in infostealer (83.3 vs SOCRadar 71.7) and third-party risk (6 vs SOCRadar 5). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (0 vs SOCRadar 5), executive protection (4 vs SOCRadar 8) and attack surface management (0 vs SOCRadar 5). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: spycloud.com
- 8
Constella Intelligence
Overall score 52.8 (11th; 10.3 points below SOCRadar). Scores higher than SOCRadar in phishing and brand protection (10 vs SOCRadar 5). Scores lower in infostealer (69.1 vs SOCRadar 71.7), third-party risk (0 vs SOCRadar 5), executive protection (6 vs SOCRadar 8) and attack surface management (0 vs SOCRadar 5).
United States · Website scanned: constella.ai
- 9
Flashpoint
Overall score 50.2 (13th; 12.9 points below SOCRadar). Scores higher than SOCRadar in phishing and brand protection (10 vs SOCRadar 5). Scores lower in infostealer (63.0 vs SOCRadar 71.7), third-party risk (0 vs SOCRadar 5), executive protection (2 vs SOCRadar 8) and attack surface management (4 vs SOCRadar 5).
United States · Website scanned: flashpoint.io
- 10
Lunar (Webz.io)
Overall score 37.8 (25th; 25.3 points below SOCRadar). Scores lower in infostealer (71.0 vs SOCRadar 71.7), third-party risk (0 vs SOCRadar 5), phishing and brand protection (0 vs SOCRadar 5), executive protection (2 vs SOCRadar 8) and attack surface management (0 vs SOCRadar 5). API: public documentation.
Israel · Website scanned: webz.io
SOCRadar vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | SOCRadar | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.1 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 7th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | 71.7 | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 5 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 9 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 4 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 8 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 8 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | 9 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | 8 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 5 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 5 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 8 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 5 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | The Infostealer Index 2026 | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.