Lunar (Webz.io) alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Lunar (Webz.io) is a provider headquartered in Israel and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 37.8 out of 100, ranking 25th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 37.8 / 100 · 25th of 100
- Infostealer
- 71.0 / 100 · 6th of 35
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · 61st of 98
- Executive protection
- 2 / 10 · 19th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 0 / 10 · 81st of 98
- API
- 10 / 10 · Public documentation (docs.webz.io)
- Country
- Israel
- Selection source
- The Infostealer Index 2026
- Website scanned
- webz.io
- Recorded during scanning
- Only the content on the landing page could be reviewed.
Lunar (Webz.io) score profile
- Infostealer
- 71.0 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 2 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 0 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 10 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Lunar (Webz.io) ranks 25th among 100 providers with an overall score of 37.8, placing it in the top quarter. The next score up belongs to ZeroFox and Axur (39.5, 1.7 points higher). The next score down belongs to RiskProfiler and UpGuard (36.8, 1.0 points lower).
Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 17th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 34.5 points above. Among the 7 providers headquartered in Israel it ranks 3rd; the closest scores in that list belong to Hudson Rock (49.0) and KELA (31.7).
Of its overall score of 37.8, 29.9 points come from infostealer, 2.6 from the four product categories and 5.3 from the API score; the largest share, 79%, comes from the infostealer score. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.
Its infostealer score is 71.0, ranking 6th among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in free access (9 / 10; ranked 3rd). Its lowest is in device-level infection details (6 / 10; ranked 10th). It is above the average on 6 of the seven criteria.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 1 of the four product categories: executive protection. Its strongest category relative to the average is executive protection: 2 / 10 against an average of 1.6. It falls furthest below the average in attack surface management: 0 / 10 against 4.9. Its best category rank is in executive protection: 19th, shared with 8 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to Have I Been Pwned: overall score 24.7, with the same score in 3 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- Infostealer score 71.0; 5 providers score higher in this category.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk, phishing and brand protection and attack surface management.
- Executive protection: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Lunar (Webz.io)’s strongest categories (infostealer): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Lunar (Webz.io).
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- WhiteIntel45.4
- CybelAngel44.6
- Outpost24 Threat Compass39.7
- Lunar (Webz.io)37.8
- Group-IB36.6
- DarkStrata34.5
- Resecurity33.1
- KELA31.7
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 56.2 points above Lunar (Webz.io)). Scores higher than Lunar (Webz.io) in infostealer (98.2 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 71.0), third-party risk (9 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0), executive protection (9 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 2) and attack surface management (9 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0).
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 34.5 points above Lunar (Webz.io)). Scores higher than Lunar (Webz.io) in third-party risk (10 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0), executive protection (8 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 2) and attack surface management (8 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0). Scores lower in infostealer (46.7 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 71.0).
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 32.1 points above Lunar (Webz.io)). Scores higher than Lunar (Webz.io) in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0), executive protection (10 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 2) and attack surface management (8 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0). Scores lower in infostealer (66.1 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 71.0).
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
WhiteIntel
Overall score 45.4 (17th; 7.6 points above Lunar (Webz.io)). Scores higher than Lunar (Webz.io) in third-party risk (6 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0) and phishing and brand protection (6 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0). Scores lower in infostealer (57.9 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 71.0) and executive protection (0 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 2).
Türkiye · Website scanned: whiteintel.io
- 5
CybelAngel
Overall score 44.6 (20th; 6.8 points above Lunar (Webz.io)). Scores higher than Lunar (Webz.io) in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0). Scores lower in infostealer (49.6 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 71.0) and executive protection (0 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 2).
France · Website scanned: cybelangel.com
- 6
Outpost24 Threat Compass
Overall score 39.7 (22nd; 1.9 points above Lunar (Webz.io)). Scores higher than Lunar (Webz.io) in phishing and brand protection (6 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0) and attack surface management (6 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0). Scores lower in infostealer (50.6 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 71.0) and executive protection (0 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 2). API: behind a login or contract.
Sweden · Website scanned: outpost24.com
- 7
Group-IB
Overall score 36.6 (28th; 1.2 points below Lunar (Webz.io)). Scores higher than Lunar (Webz.io) in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0) and attack surface management (2 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0). Scores lower in infostealer (49.4 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 71.0) and executive protection (0 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 2). API: behind a login or contract.
Singapore · Website scanned: group-ib.com
- 8
DarkStrata
Overall score 34.5 (29th; 3.3 points below Lunar (Webz.io)). Scores higher than Lunar (Webz.io) in executive protection (8 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 2). Scores lower in infostealer (44.5 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 71.0).
United Kingdom · Website scanned: darkstrata.io
- 9
Resecurity
Overall score 33.1 (31st; 4.7 points below Lunar (Webz.io)). Scores higher than Lunar (Webz.io) in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0) and attack surface management (2 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 0). Scores lower in infostealer (34.8 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 71.0). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: resecurity.com
- 10
KELA
Overall score 31.7 (32nd; 6.1 points below Lunar (Webz.io)). Scores lower in infostealer (69.0 vs Lunar (Webz.io) 71.0). API: behind a login or contract.
Israel · Website scanned: kelacyber.com
Lunar (Webz.io) vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | Lunar (Webz.io) | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.8 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 25th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | 71.0 | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 8 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 6 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 6 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 8 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | 6 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | 9 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 0 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 2 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 0 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Israel | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | The Infostealer Index 2026 | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.