ThreatBook alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
ThreatBook is a provider headquartered in China and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence. Its overall score is 34.2 out of 100, ranking 30th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 34.2 / 100 · 30th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 2 / 10 · 38th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- API
- 10 / 10 · Public documentation
- Country
- China
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence
- Website scanned
- threatbook.io
ThreatBook score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 2 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 10 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 10 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
ThreatBook ranks 30th among 100 providers with an overall score of 34.2, placing it in the top half. The next score up belongs to DarkStrata (34.5, 0.3 points higher). The next score down belongs to Resecurity (33.1, 1.1 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 7th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 10.5 points above. It is the only provider in the comparison headquartered in China.
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 34.2, 28.9 points come from the four product categories and 5.3 from the API score. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 2 of the four product categories: phishing and brand protection and attack surface management. Its strongest category relative to the average is phishing and brand protection: 10 / 10 against an average of 3.7. It falls furthest below the average in executive protection: 0 / 10 against 1.6. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 1st, shared with 16 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to these 2 providers: UpGuard and ScruteX (BrandSek); the first has an overall score of 36.8, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in executive protection.
- Third-party risk: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in ThreatBook’s strongest categories (phishing and brand protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to ThreatBook.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- RiskProfiler36.8
- UpGuard36.8
- Group-IB36.6
- ThreatBook34.2
- Resecurity33.1
- Black Kite31.6
- Panorays31.6
- Foresiet31.6
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 59.8 points above ThreatBook). Scores higher than ThreatBook in third-party risk (9 vs ThreatBook 2) and executive protection (9 vs ThreatBook 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (9 vs ThreatBook 10) and attack surface management (9 vs ThreatBook 10).
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 38.1 points above ThreatBook). Scores higher than ThreatBook in third-party risk (10 vs ThreatBook 2) and executive protection (8 vs ThreatBook 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (8 vs ThreatBook 10).
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 35.7 points above ThreatBook). Scores higher than ThreatBook in executive protection (10 vs ThreatBook 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs ThreatBook 2) and attack surface management (8 vs ThreatBook 10).
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
RiskProfiler
Overall score 36.8 (26th; 2.6 points above ThreatBook). Scores higher than ThreatBook in third-party risk (8 vs ThreatBook 2) and executive protection (2 vs ThreatBook 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs ThreatBook 10). API: no documentation found.
United States · Website scanned: riskprofiler.io
- 5
UpGuard
Overall score 36.8 (26th; 2.6 points above ThreatBook). Scores higher than ThreatBook in third-party risk (6 vs ThreatBook 2). Scores lower in attack surface management (8 vs ThreatBook 10).
United States · Website scanned: upguard.com
- 6
Group-IB
Overall score 36.6 (28th; 2.4 points above ThreatBook). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs ThreatBook 2), phishing and brand protection (8 vs ThreatBook 10) and attack surface management (2 vs ThreatBook 10). API: behind a login or contract.
Singapore · Website scanned: group-ib.com
- 7
Resecurity
Overall score 33.1 (31st; 1.1 points below ThreatBook). Scores higher than ThreatBook in executive protection (2 vs ThreatBook 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs ThreatBook 2), phishing and brand protection (8 vs ThreatBook 10) and attack surface management (2 vs ThreatBook 10). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: resecurity.com
- 8
Black Kite
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 2.6 points below ThreatBook). Scores higher than ThreatBook in third-party risk (10 vs ThreatBook 2). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs ThreatBook 10). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: blackkite.com
- 9
Panorays
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 2.6 points below ThreatBook). Scores higher than ThreatBook in third-party risk (8 vs ThreatBook 2). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs ThreatBook 10).
United States · Website scanned: panorays.com
- 10
Foresiet
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 2.6 points below ThreatBook). Scores higher than ThreatBook in third-party risk (8 vs ThreatBook 2) and executive protection (2 vs ThreatBook 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs ThreatBook 10) and attack surface management (6 vs ThreatBook 10). API: no documentation found.
India · Website scanned: foresiet.com
ThreatBook vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | ThreatBook | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.2 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 30th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 2 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | China | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.