Skip to content

Black Kite alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared

Black Kite is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through Türkiye-linked providers. Its overall score is 31.6 out of 100, ranking 33rd among 100 providers.

Published
Scanned
3–4 November 2026
Infostealer score source
The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
Overall score and rank
31.6 / 100 · 33rd of 100
Infostealer
Not in the index
Third-party risk
10 / 10 · 1st of 98
Phishing and brand protection
2 / 10 · 42nd of 98
Executive protection
0 / 10 · 28th of 98
Attack surface management
10 / 10 · 1st of 98
API
5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
Country
United States
Selection source
Türkiye-linked providers
Website scanned
blackkite.com
Recorded during scanning
Headquartered in Boston; co-founder is Turkish.
Country information source
Country information source: multiple sources.

Black Kite score profile

Black Kite against the provider average
Infostealer
Not in the index
Third-party risk
10 / 10 · average 2.8
Phishing and brand protection
2 / 10 · average 3.7
Executive protection
0 / 10 · average 1.6
Attack surface management
10 / 10 · average 4.9
API
5 / 10 · average 5.3

Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.

Black Kite ranks 33rd among 100 providers with an overall score of 31.6, placing it in the top half. It shares the same overall score with Panorays and Foresiet. The next score up belongs to KELA (31.7, 0.1 points higher). The next score down belongs to Searchlight Cyber (29.8, 1.8 points lower).

Among the 24 providers selected through the same source (Türkiye-linked providers), it ranks 4th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Dark Radar (94.0), 62.4 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 13th; the closest scores in that list belong to Resecurity (33.1) and Panorays (31.6).

Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 31.6, 29.0 points come from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.

It scores above the average of 98 providers in 2 of the four product categories: third-party risk and attack surface management. Its strongest category relative to the average is third-party risk: 10 / 10 against an average of 2.8. It falls furthest below the average in phishing and brand protection: 2 / 10 against 3.7. Its best category rank is in third-party risk: 1st, shared with 3 providers.

Its score distribution is closest to Panorays: overall score 31.6, with the same score in 3 of the four categories.

Why look for alternatives

  • No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
  • No capability was identified on the scanned pages in executive protection.
  • Phishing and brand protection: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
  • API documentation is available behind a login or contract.

10 closest alternatives

The list is drawn from providers that score in Black Kite’s strongest categories (third-party risk and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Black Kite.

Overall score: Black Kite and its 10 alternatives
  1. Dark Radar94.0
  2. Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
  3. Cyble64.8
  4. RiskProfiler36.8
  5. ThreatBook34.2
  6. Black Kite31.6
  7. Panorays31.6
  8. Foresiet31.6
  9. Searchlight Cyber29.8
  10. ECHO28.9
  11. SecurityScorecard28.9
  1. 1

    Dark Radar

    Overall score 94.0 (1st; 62.4 points above Black Kite). Scores higher than Black Kite in phishing and brand protection (9 vs Black Kite 2) and executive protection (9 vs Black Kite 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (9 vs Black Kite 10) and attack surface management (9 vs Black Kite 10). API: public documentation.

    Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com

  2. 2

    Bitsight (Cybersixgill)

    Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 40.7 points above Black Kite). Scores higher than Black Kite in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Black Kite 2) and executive protection (8 vs Black Kite 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (8 vs Black Kite 10). API: public documentation.

    United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com

  3. 3

    Cyble

    Overall score 64.8 (5th; 33.2 points above Black Kite). Scores higher than Black Kite in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Black Kite 2) and executive protection (10 vs Black Kite 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (4 vs Black Kite 10) and attack surface management (8 vs Black Kite 10).

    United States · Website scanned: cyble.com

  4. 4

    RiskProfiler

    Overall score 36.8 (26th; 5.2 points above Black Kite). Scores higher than Black Kite in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Black Kite 2) and executive protection (2 vs Black Kite 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (8 vs Black Kite 10). API: no documentation found.

    United States · Website scanned: riskprofiler.io

  5. 5

    ThreatBook

    Overall score 34.2 (30th; 2.6 points above Black Kite). Scores higher than Black Kite in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Black Kite 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs Black Kite 10). API: public documentation.

    China · Website scanned: threatbook.io

  6. 6

    Panorays

    Overall score 31.6 (33rd; same as Black Kite). Scores lower in third-party risk (8 vs Black Kite 10). API: public documentation.

    United States · Website scanned: panorays.com

  7. 7

    Foresiet

    Overall score 31.6 (33rd; same as Black Kite). Scores higher than Black Kite in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Black Kite 2) and executive protection (2 vs Black Kite 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (8 vs Black Kite 10) and attack surface management (6 vs Black Kite 10). API: no documentation found.

    India · Website scanned: foresiet.com

  8. 8

    Searchlight Cyber

    Overall score 29.8 (36th; 1.8 points below Black Kite). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs Black Kite 10), phishing and brand protection (0 vs Black Kite 2) and attack surface management (4 vs Black Kite 10).

    United Kingdom · Website scanned: slcyber.io

  9. 9

    ECHO

    Overall score 28.9 (37th; 2.7 points below Black Kite). Scores higher than Black Kite in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Black Kite 2) and executive protection (4 vs Black Kite 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs Black Kite 10) and attack surface management (4 vs Black Kite 10).

    Türkiye · Website scanned: echocti.com

  10. 10

    SecurityScorecard

    Overall score 28.9 (37th; 2.7 points below Black Kite). Scores higher than Black Kite in phishing and brand protection (4 vs Black Kite 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (8 vs Black Kite 10) and attack surface management (6 vs Black Kite 10). API: public documentation.

    United States · Website scanned: securityscorecard.com

Black Kite vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and Cyble

CriterionBlack KiteDark RadarBitsight (Cybersixgill)Cyble
Overall score31.694.072.364.8
Overall rank33rd1st2nd5th
Infostealer score–98.246.747.7
Infostealer focus (15%)–944
Device-level infection details (15%)–1055
Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%)–1043
Session cookie and token coverage (10%)–1053
Collection timeliness (10%)–1077
Published research (10%)–1078
Free access (10%)–1014
Third-party risk109104
Phishing and brand protection291010
Executive protection09810
Attack surface management10988
API510105
CountryUnited StatesTürkiyeUnited StatesUnited States
Selection sourceTürkiye-linked providersTürkiye-linked providersThe Infostealer Index 2026The Infostealer Index 2026

Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.

Related pages

This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.