ECHO alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
ECHO is a provider headquartered in Türkiye and was included in this comparison through Türkiye-linked providers. Its overall score is 28.9 out of 100, ranking 37th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 28.9 / 100 · 37th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 2 / 10 · 38th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- Executive protection
- 4 / 10 · 15th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · 44th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract (documentation behind login)
- Country
- Türkiye
- Selection source
- Türkiye-linked providers
- Website scanned
- echocti.com
ECHO score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 2 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 10 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 4 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
ECHO ranks 37th among 100 providers with an overall score of 28.9, placing it in the top half. It shares the same overall score with SecurityScorecard. The next score up belongs to Searchlight Cyber (29.8, 0.9 points higher). The next score down belongs to DarkOwl (26.7, 2.2 points lower).
Among the 24 providers selected through the same source (Türkiye-linked providers), it ranks 5th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Dark Radar (94.0), 65.1 points above. Among the 23 providers headquartered in Türkiye it ranks 6th; the closest scores in that list belong to WhiteIntel (45.4) and IntelRadar (21.1).
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 28.9, 26.3 points come from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract (documentation behind login).
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 2 of the four product categories: phishing and brand protection and executive protection. Its strongest category relative to the average is phishing and brand protection: 10 / 10 against an average of 3.7. It falls furthest below the average in attack surface management: 4 / 10 against 4.9. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 1st, shared with 16 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to Resecurity: overall score 33.1, with the same score in 0 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- Third-party risk: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- Executive protection: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in ECHO’s strongest categories (phishing and brand protection): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to ECHO.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- Resecurity33.1
- Black Kite31.6
- Panorays31.6
- Foresiet31.6
- ECHO28.9
- SecurityScorecard28.9
- TechOwl Shield26.3
- ScruteX (BrandSek)26.3
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 65.1 points above ECHO). Scores higher than ECHO in third-party risk (9 vs ECHO 2), executive protection (9 vs ECHO 4) and attack surface management (9 vs ECHO 4). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (9 vs ECHO 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 43.4 points above ECHO). Scores higher than ECHO in third-party risk (10 vs ECHO 2), executive protection (8 vs ECHO 4) and attack surface management (8 vs ECHO 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 41.0 points above ECHO). Scores higher than ECHO in executive protection (10 vs ECHO 4) and attack surface management (8 vs ECHO 4). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs ECHO 2). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
Resecurity
Overall score 33.1 (31st; 4.2 points above ECHO). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs ECHO 2), phishing and brand protection (8 vs ECHO 10), executive protection (2 vs ECHO 4) and attack surface management (2 vs ECHO 4).
United States · Website scanned: resecurity.com
- 5
Black Kite
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 2.7 points above ECHO). Scores higher than ECHO in third-party risk (10 vs ECHO 2) and attack surface management (10 vs ECHO 4). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs ECHO 10) and executive protection (0 vs ECHO 4).
United States · Website scanned: blackkite.com
- 6
Panorays
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 2.7 points above ECHO). Scores higher than ECHO in third-party risk (8 vs ECHO 2) and attack surface management (10 vs ECHO 4). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs ECHO 10) and executive protection (0 vs ECHO 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: panorays.com
- 7
Foresiet
Overall score 31.6 (33rd; 2.7 points above ECHO). Scores higher than ECHO in third-party risk (8 vs ECHO 2) and attack surface management (6 vs ECHO 4). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (8 vs ECHO 10) and executive protection (2 vs ECHO 4). API: no documentation found.
India · Website scanned: foresiet.com
- 8
SecurityScorecard
Overall score 28.9 (37th; same as ECHO). Scores higher than ECHO in third-party risk (8 vs ECHO 2) and attack surface management (6 vs ECHO 4). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (4 vs ECHO 10) and executive protection (0 vs ECHO 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: securityscorecard.com
- 9
TechOwl Shield
Overall score 26.3 (40th; 2.6 points below ECHO). Scores higher than ECHO in attack surface management (8 vs ECHO 4). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs ECHO 2) and phishing and brand protection (8 vs ECHO 10). API: no documentation found.
India · Website scanned: techowlshield.com
- 10
ScruteX (BrandSek)
Overall score 26.3 (40th; 2.6 points below ECHO). Scores higher than ECHO in attack surface management (8 vs ECHO 4). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (6 vs ECHO 10) and executive protection (0 vs ECHO 4). API: public documentation.
Australia · Website scanned: scrutex.ai
ECHO vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | ECHO | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 28.9 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 37th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 2 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 4 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 4 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Türkiye | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Türkiye-linked providers | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.