CloudSEK alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
CloudSEK is a provider headquartered in India and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 24.0 out of 100, ranking 43rd among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 24.0 / 100 · 43rd of 100
- Infostealer
- 44.5 / 100 · 24th of 35
- Third-party risk
- Website could not be scanned
- Phishing and brand protection
- Website could not be scanned
- Executive protection
- Website could not be scanned
- Attack surface management
- Website could not be scanned
- API
- 10 / 10 · Public documentation (api.cloudsek.com)
- Country
- India
- Selection source
- The Infostealer Index 2026
- Website scanned
- cloudsek.com
- Recorded during scanning
- The Cloudflare check could not be passed; surfaces could not be scanned.
CloudSEK score profile
- Infostealer
- 44.5 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- Website could not be scanned
- Phishing and brand protection
- Website could not be scanned
- Executive protection
- Website could not be scanned
- Attack surface management
- Website could not be scanned
- API
- 10 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
CloudSEK ranks 43rd among 100 providers with an overall score of 24.0, placing it in the top half. The next score up belongs to Have I Been Pwned (24.7, 0.7 points higher). The next score down belongs to ThingsRecon (23.7, 0.3 points lower).
Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 25th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 48.3 points above. Among the 4 providers headquartered in India it ranks 3rd; the closest scores in that list belong to TechOwl Shield (26.3) and Aquila I (21.1).
Because its category scores could not be measured, its overall score of 24.0 consists only of the infostealer (18.7) and API (5.3) contributions. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.
Its infostealer score is 44.5, ranking 24th among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in published research (8 / 10; ranked 8th). Its lowest is in session cookie and token coverage (2 / 10; ranked 22nd). It is above the average on 1 of the seven criteria.
The other provider whose category scores could not be measured is KELA (overall score 31.7).
Why look for alternatives
- Infostealer score 44.5; 23 providers score higher in this category.
- The website could not be opened during automated scanning, so category scores could not be measured.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in CloudSEK’s highest-scoring category (infostealer): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to CloudSEK.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- DarkOwl26.7
- Have I Been Pwned24.7
- CloudSEK24.0
- LeakRadar22.1
- StealthMole22.0
- HackedList20.4
- Intelligence X19.8
- Farnsworth Intelligence19.4
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 70.0 points above CloudSEK). Scores higher than CloudSEK in infostealer (98.2 vs CloudSEK 44.5).
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 48.3 points above CloudSEK). Scores higher than CloudSEK in infostealer (46.7 vs CloudSEK 44.5).
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 45.9 points above CloudSEK). Scores higher than CloudSEK in infostealer (66.1 vs CloudSEK 44.5).
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
DarkOwl
Overall score 26.7 (39th; 2.7 points above CloudSEK). Scores lower in infostealer (38.3 vs CloudSEK 44.5).
United States · Website scanned: darkowl.com
- 5
Have I Been Pwned
Overall score 24.7 (42nd; 0.7 points above CloudSEK). Scores higher than CloudSEK in infostealer (46.2 vs CloudSEK 44.5).
Australia · Website scanned: haveibeenpwned.com
- 6
LeakRadar
Overall score 22.1 (45th; 1.9 points below CloudSEK). Scores lower in infostealer (40.1 vs CloudSEK 44.5).
France · Website scanned: leakradar.io
- 7
StealthMole
Overall score 22.0 (46th; 2.0 points below CloudSEK). Scores higher than CloudSEK in infostealer (45.9 vs CloudSEK 44.5). API: behind a login or contract.
Singapore · Website scanned: stealthmole.com
- 8
HackedList
Overall score 20.4 (56th; 3.6 points below CloudSEK). Scores lower in infostealer (35.9 vs CloudSEK 44.5).
Czechia · Website scanned: hackedlist.io
- 9
Intelligence X
Overall score 19.8 (57th; 4.2 points below CloudSEK). Scores lower in infostealer (34.6 vs CloudSEK 44.5).
Czechia · Website scanned: intelx.io
- 10
Farnsworth Intelligence
Overall score 19.4 (58th; 4.6 points below CloudSEK). Scores higher than CloudSEK in infostealer (46.0 vs CloudSEK 44.5). API: no documentation found.
United States · Website scanned: farnsworthintelligence.com
CloudSEK vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | CloudSEK | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 24.0 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 43rd | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | 44.5 | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 3 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 4 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 5 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 2 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 6 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | 8 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | 4 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | – | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | – | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | – | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | – | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | India | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | The Infostealer Index 2026 | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.