HackedList alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
HackedList is a provider headquartered in Czechia and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 20.4 out of 100, ranking 56th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 20.4 / 100 · 56th of 100
- Infostealer
- 35.9 / 100 · 30th of 35
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · 61st of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 0 / 10 · 81st of 98
- API
- 10 / 10 · Public documentation
- Country
- Czechia
- Selection source
- The Infostealer Index 2026
- Website scanned
- hackedlist.io
- Country information source
- Country information sources: Dealroom and CzechTrade.
HackedList score profile
- Infostealer
- 35.9 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 0 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 10 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
HackedList ranks 56th among 100 providers with an overall score of 20.4, placing it in the lower half. The next score up belongs to IntelRadar, Palo Alto Networks (Xpanse), Darkivore (Potech) and 6 more providers (21.1, 0.7 points higher). The next score down belongs to Intelligence X (19.8, 0.6 points lower).
Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 28th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 51.9 points above. Among the 2 providers headquartered in Czechia it ranks 1st; the closest scores in that list belong to Intelligence X (19.8).
Of its overall score of 20.4, 15.1 points come from infostealer, 0.0 from the four product categories and 5.3 from the API score; the largest share, 74%, comes from the infostealer score. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.
Its infostealer score is 35.9, ranking 30th among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in Infostealer focus (8 / 10; ranked 4th). Its lowest is in session cookie and token coverage (1 / 10; ranked 27th). It is above the average on 2 of the seven criteria.
It does not score above the average of 98 providers in any of the four product categories. It falls furthest below the average in attack surface management: 0 / 10 against 4.9.
Its score distribution is closest to Intelligence X: overall score 19.8, with the same score in 4 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- Infostealer score 35.9; 29 providers score higher in this category.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk, phishing and brand protection, executive protection and attack surface management.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in HackedList’s highest-scoring category (infostealer): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to HackedList.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- CloudSEK24.0
- LeakRadar22.1
- StealthMole22.0
- HackedList20.4
- Intelligence X19.8
- Farnsworth Intelligence19.4
- LeakCheck16.9
- SOS Intelligence16.4
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 73.6 points above HackedList). Scores higher than HackedList in infostealer (98.2 vs HackedList 35.9), third-party risk (9 vs HackedList 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs HackedList 0), executive protection (9 vs HackedList 0) and attack surface management (9 vs HackedList 0).
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 51.9 points above HackedList). Scores higher than HackedList in infostealer (46.7 vs HackedList 35.9), third-party risk (10 vs HackedList 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs HackedList 0), executive protection (8 vs HackedList 0) and attack surface management (8 vs HackedList 0).
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 49.5 points above HackedList). Scores higher than HackedList in infostealer (66.1 vs HackedList 35.9), phishing and brand protection (10 vs HackedList 0), executive protection (10 vs HackedList 0) and attack surface management (8 vs HackedList 0).
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
CloudSEK
Overall score 24.0 (43rd; 3.6 points above HackedList). Scores higher than HackedList in infostealer (44.5 vs HackedList 35.9).
India · Website scanned: cloudsek.com
- 5
LeakRadar
Overall score 22.1 (45th; 1.7 points above HackedList). Scores higher than HackedList in infostealer (40.1 vs HackedList 35.9).
France · Website scanned: leakradar.io
- 6
StealthMole
Overall score 22.0 (46th; 1.6 points above HackedList). Scores higher than HackedList in infostealer (45.9 vs HackedList 35.9). API: behind a login or contract.
Singapore · Website scanned: stealthmole.com
- 7
Intelligence X
Overall score 19.8 (57th; 0.6 points below HackedList). Scores lower in infostealer (34.6 vs HackedList 35.9).
Czechia · Website scanned: intelx.io
- 8
Farnsworth Intelligence
Overall score 19.4 (58th; 1.0 points below HackedList). Scores higher than HackedList in infostealer (46.0 vs HackedList 35.9). API: no documentation found.
United States · Website scanned: farnsworthintelligence.com
- 9
LeakCheck
Overall score 16.9 (66th; 3.5 points below HackedList). Scores lower in infostealer (27.7 vs HackedList 35.9).
United Kingdom · Website scanned: leakcheck.io
- 10
SOS Intelligence
Overall score 16.4 (67th; 4.0 points below HackedList). Scores lower in infostealer (32.8 vs HackedList 35.9). API: behind a login or contract.
United Kingdom · Website scanned: sosintel.co.uk
HackedList vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | HackedList | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 20.4 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 56th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | 35.9 | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 8 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 2 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 2 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 1 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 5 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | 1 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | 5 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 0 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 0 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Czechia | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | The Infostealer Index 2026 | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.