Criminal IP (AI Spera) alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Criminal IP (AI Spera) is a provider headquartered in South Korea and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, attack surface. Its overall score is 21.1 out of 100, ranking 47th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 21.1 / 100 · 47th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 4 / 10 · 25th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 2 / 10 · 42nd of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 8 / 10 · 16th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
- Country
- South Korea
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, attack surface
- Website scanned
- criminalip.io
Criminal IP (AI Spera) score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 4 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 2 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 8 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Criminal IP (AI Spera) ranks 47th among 100 providers with an overall score of 21.1, placing it in the top half. It shares the same overall score with IntelRadar, Palo Alto Networks (Xpanse), Darkivore (Potech) and 5 more providers. The next score up belongs to StealthMole (22.0, 0.9 points higher). The next score down belongs to HackedList (20.4, 0.7 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 12th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 23.6 points above. It is the only provider in the comparison headquartered in South Korea.
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 21.1, 18.5 points come from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 2 of the four product categories: third-party risk and attack surface management. Its strongest category relative to the average is attack surface management: 8 / 10 against an average of 4.9. It falls furthest below the average in phishing and brand protection: 2 / 10 against 3.7. Its best category rank is in attack surface management: 16th, shared with 18 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to these 2 providers: IONIX and Zynap; the first has an overall score of 21.1, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in executive protection.
- Third-party risk: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- Phishing and brand protection: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 4 of five capabilities identified (8 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Criminal IP (AI Spera)’s strongest categories (attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Criminal IP (AI Spera).
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- Criminal IP (AI Spera)21.1
- IntelRadar21.1
- Palo Alto Networks (Xpanse)21.1
- Darkivore (Potech)21.1
- IONIX21.1
- Censys21.1
- Aquila I21.1
- Orpheus Cyber21.1
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 72.9 points above Criminal IP (AI Spera)). Scores higher than Criminal IP (AI Spera) in third-party risk (9 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 4), phishing and brand protection (9 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 2), executive protection (9 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 0) and attack surface management (9 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 8). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 51.2 points above Criminal IP (AI Spera)). Scores higher than Criminal IP (AI Spera) in third-party risk (10 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 4), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 2) and executive protection (8 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 0). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 48.8 points above Criminal IP (AI Spera)). Scores higher than Criminal IP (AI Spera) in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 2) and executive protection (10 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 4). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
IntelRadar
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as Criminal IP (AI Spera)). Scores higher than Criminal IP (AI Spera) in phishing and brand protection (6 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 2) and attack surface management (10 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 8). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 4). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: intelradar.io
- 5
Palo Alto Networks (Xpanse)
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as Criminal IP (AI Spera)). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (0 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 2). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/cortex-xpanse
- 6
Darkivore (Potech)
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as Criminal IP (AI Spera)). Scores higher than Criminal IP (AI Spera) in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 2) and executive protection (2 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 4) and attack surface management (4 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 8). API: no documentation found.
Lebanon · Website scanned: potech.global/darkivore
- 7
IONIX
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as Criminal IP (AI Spera)). Scores higher than Criminal IP (AI Spera) in attack surface management (10 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 8). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 4).
Israel · Website scanned: ionix.io
- 8
Censys
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as Criminal IP (AI Spera)). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: censys.com
- 9
Aquila I
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as Criminal IP (AI Spera)). Scores higher than Criminal IP (AI Spera) in phishing and brand protection (4 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 2). API: no documentation found.
India · Website scanned: aquilai.io
- 10
Orpheus Cyber
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as Criminal IP (AI Spera)). Scores higher than Criminal IP (AI Spera) in third-party risk (6 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 4) and attack surface management (10 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 8). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (0 vs Criminal IP (AI Spera) 2). API: no documentation found.
United Kingdom · Website scanned: orpheus-cyber.com
Criminal IP (AI Spera) vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | Criminal IP (AI Spera) | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 21.1 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 47th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 4 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 2 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | South Korea | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, attack surface | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.