IntelRadar alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
IntelRadar is a provider headquartered in Türkiye and was included in this comparison through Türkiye-linked providers. Its overall score is 21.1 out of 100, ranking 47th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 21.1 / 100 · 47th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 6 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 10 / 10 · 1st of 98
- API
- 0 / 10 · No documentation found
- Country
- Türkiye
- Selection source
- Türkiye-linked providers
- Website scanned
- intelradar.io
IntelRadar score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 6 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 10 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 0 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
IntelRadar ranks 47th among 100 providers with an overall score of 21.1, placing it in the top half. It shares the same overall score with Palo Alto Networks (Xpanse), Darkivore (Potech), IONIX and 5 more providers. The next score up belongs to StealthMole (22.0, 0.9 points higher). The next score down belongs to HackedList (20.4, 0.7 points lower).
Among the 24 providers selected through the same source (Türkiye-linked providers), it ranks 6th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Dark Radar (94.0), 72.9 points above. Among the 23 providers headquartered in Türkiye it ranks 7th; the closest scores in that list belong to ECHO (28.9) and SwordSec (18.4).
Because it is not in the index and no API documentation was found, its entire overall score of 21.1 comes from the four product categories. It is one of 30 providers for which no API documentation was found.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 2 of the four product categories: phishing and brand protection and attack surface management. Its strongest category relative to the average is attack surface management: 10 / 10 against an average of 4.9. It falls furthest below the average in third-party risk: 0 / 10 against 2.8. Its best category rank is in attack surface management: 1st, shared with 13 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to TrySec: overall score 15.8, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk and executive protection.
- Phishing and brand protection: 3 of five capabilities identified (6 / 10).
- No API documentation was found on the website or in search results.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in IntelRadar’s strongest categories (phishing and brand protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to IntelRadar.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- ThingsRecon23.7
- IntelRadar21.1
- Darkivore (Potech)21.1
- IONIX21.1
- Censys21.1
- Criminal IP (AI Spera)21.1
- Aquila I21.1
- SwordSec18.4
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 72.9 points above IntelRadar). Scores higher than IntelRadar in third-party risk (9 vs IntelRadar 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs IntelRadar 6) and executive protection (9 vs IntelRadar 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (9 vs IntelRadar 10). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 51.2 points above IntelRadar). Scores higher than IntelRadar in third-party risk (10 vs IntelRadar 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs IntelRadar 6) and executive protection (8 vs IntelRadar 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (8 vs IntelRadar 10). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 48.8 points above IntelRadar). Scores higher than IntelRadar in phishing and brand protection (10 vs IntelRadar 6) and executive protection (10 vs IntelRadar 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (8 vs IntelRadar 10). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
ThingsRecon
Overall score 23.7 (44th; 2.6 points above IntelRadar). Scores higher than IntelRadar in third-party risk (8 vs IntelRadar 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs IntelRadar 6) and attack surface management (8 vs IntelRadar 10).
Netherlands · Website scanned: thingsrecon.com
- 5
Darkivore (Potech)
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as IntelRadar). Scores higher than IntelRadar in phishing and brand protection (10 vs IntelRadar 6) and executive protection (2 vs IntelRadar 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (4 vs IntelRadar 10).
Lebanon · Website scanned: potech.global/darkivore
- 6
IONIX
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as IntelRadar). Scores higher than IntelRadar in third-party risk (2 vs IntelRadar 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs IntelRadar 6). API: behind a login or contract.
Israel · Website scanned: ionix.io
- 7
Censys
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as IntelRadar). Scores higher than IntelRadar in third-party risk (2 vs IntelRadar 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs IntelRadar 6) and attack surface management (8 vs IntelRadar 10). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: censys.com
- 8
Criminal IP (AI Spera)
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as IntelRadar). Scores higher than IntelRadar in third-party risk (4 vs IntelRadar 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs IntelRadar 6) and attack surface management (8 vs IntelRadar 10). API: behind a login or contract.
South Korea · Website scanned: criminalip.io
- 9
Aquila I
Overall score 21.1 (47th; same as IntelRadar). Scores higher than IntelRadar in third-party risk (4 vs IntelRadar 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (4 vs IntelRadar 6) and attack surface management (8 vs IntelRadar 10).
India · Website scanned: aquilai.io
- 10
SwordSec
Overall score 18.4 (59th; 2.7 points below IntelRadar). Scores higher than IntelRadar in phishing and brand protection (8 vs IntelRadar 6). Scores lower in attack surface management (6 vs IntelRadar 10).
Türkiye · Website scanned: swordsec.com
IntelRadar vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | IntelRadar | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 21.1 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 47th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 6 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Türkiye | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Türkiye-linked providers | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.