Skip to content
Ransomware

Handala claims data breach against Sivim IT

The threat group known as Handala claims to have conducted a data breach targeting Sivim IT.

By
Siberpol Intelligence Unit
Published
3 min read
3 min read
  • Ransomware group: Handala
  • Country: Italy
  • Sector: Technology
  • Announcement date: June 20, 2025

The threat group known as Handala has published an announcement on a leak site claiming to have conducted a data breach targeting Sivim IT. According to the claims made by the group, they have successfully infiltrated the networks of the organization and gained unauthorized access to its systems.

The details of the claimed attack

On June 20, 2025, the Handala group released a post alleging that they had breached the digital infrastructure of Sivim IT. The group's announcement suggests a high level of impact, as they claim to have dismantled the institution's digital infrastructure during the operation. The group has characterized this specific breach as a message, rather than a purely financial endeavor.

In many modern cyberattacks, threat actors utilize leak sites to exert pressure on victims. These sites serve as a platform for groups to announce their successful intrusions, often accompanied by claims of stolen data. This tactic is frequently associated with double extortion, where attackers not only encrypt a victim's data but also threaten to release sensitive information publicly to compel payment. While the nature of the attack on Sivim IT is described by the group as a disruptive event, the specific mechanics of the intrusion remain unconfirmed.

Data involved in the incident

Regarding the specifics of the breach, the group has not provided any information regarding the nature of the leaked data. The announcement focuses on the successful infiltration of the systems rather than detailing the specific contents of the breach. Consequently, the listing names no specific data types or file counts.

Potential risks of data exposure

When an organization's systems are compromised, the potential for secondary risks is significant. Even without specific details on the stolen files, the breach of a technology provider can lead to downstream consequences. These include the possibility of targeted phishing attacks directed at the organization's clients and business partners, as attackers often use stolen credentials or internal communication styles to increase the efficacy of their social engineering attempts.

The target organization

The target of this claimed attack is Sivim IT, a company operating within the technology sector. Based in Italy, the organization provides services related to critical infrastructure. Because the company operates in a sector vital to societal functions, any compromise of its digital assets carries significant implications for the integrity of the services it provides.

Assessment and industry implications

The Handala group is assessed to have links to Iran and typically targets entities based in Israel. This incident involving an Italian-based institution may compromise the security of the critical infrastructure services provided by the institution and could lead to operational disruptions. Furthermore, because the organization is based in Italy, potential violations of data protection obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) may arise.

The group's claims of disruptive attacks may pose long-term risks to the integrity of the institution's digital assets. For organizations operating within the technology and critical infrastructure sectors, maintaining robust security postures is essential to mitigate such risks. Common defensive steps for organizations facing these threats include implementing strict access controls, maintaining offline backups, and conducting regular network monitoring to detect unauthorized infiltration early.

The long-term impact of such breaches often extends beyond the immediate technical recovery. Organizations must consider the legal, operational, and reputational consequences of a breach. In the case of critical infrastructure providers, the focus must remain on ensuring the continuity of services and the security of the digital environment to prevent broader systemic disruptions.

From the Essential plan

Third-Party Risk

Monitor leaks on your suppliers’ domains and identify at-risk suppliers at an early stage.

Related stories