CYFIRMA alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
CYFIRMA is a provider headquartered in Singapore and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence. Its overall score is 15.8 out of 100, ranking 69th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 15.8 / 100 · 69th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 6 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · 44th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
- Country
- Singapore
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence
- Website scanned
- cyfirma.com
CYFIRMA score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 6 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
CYFIRMA ranks 69th among 100 providers with an overall score of 15.8, placing it in the lower half. It shares the same overall score with TrySec, ReliaQuest, Feedly and 3 more providers. The next score up belongs to SOS Intelligence and Hold Security (16.4, 0.6 points higher). The next score down belongs to Kaduu (13.9, 1.9 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 25th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 28.9 points above. Among the 4 providers headquartered in Singapore it ranks 3rd; the closest scores in that list belong to StealthMole (22.0) and watchTowr (15.8).
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 15.8, 13.2 points come from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 1 of the four product categories: phishing and brand protection. Its strongest category relative to the average is phishing and brand protection: 6 / 10 against an average of 3.7. It falls furthest below the average in third-party risk: 0 / 10 against 2.8. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 28th, shared with 5 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to CatchProbe: overall score 7.9, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk and executive protection.
- Phishing and brand protection: 3 of five capabilities identified (6 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in CYFIRMA’s strongest categories (phishing and brand protection): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to CYFIRMA.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- SwordSec18.4
- CYFIRMA15.8
- TrySec15.8
- ReliaQuest15.8
- Feedly15.8
- Halo Security15.8
- watchTowr15.8
- Zynap15.8
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 78.2 points above CYFIRMA). Scores higher than CYFIRMA in third-party risk (9 vs CYFIRMA 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs CYFIRMA 6), executive protection (9 vs CYFIRMA 0) and attack surface management (9 vs CYFIRMA 4). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 56.5 points above CYFIRMA). Scores higher than CYFIRMA in third-party risk (10 vs CYFIRMA 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs CYFIRMA 6), executive protection (8 vs CYFIRMA 0) and attack surface management (8 vs CYFIRMA 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 54.1 points above CYFIRMA). Scores higher than CYFIRMA in phishing and brand protection (10 vs CYFIRMA 6), executive protection (10 vs CYFIRMA 0) and attack surface management (8 vs CYFIRMA 4). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
SwordSec
Overall score 18.4 (59th; 2.6 points above CYFIRMA). Scores higher than CYFIRMA in phishing and brand protection (8 vs CYFIRMA 6) and attack surface management (6 vs CYFIRMA 4). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: swordsec.com
- 5
TrySec
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as CYFIRMA). Scores higher than CYFIRMA in attack surface management (8 vs CYFIRMA 4). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (4 vs CYFIRMA 6). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: trysec.com
- 6
ReliaQuest
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as CYFIRMA). Scores higher than CYFIRMA in third-party risk (2 vs CYFIRMA 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs CYFIRMA 6). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: reliaquest.com
- 7
Feedly
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as CYFIRMA). Scores higher than CYFIRMA in third-party risk (2 vs CYFIRMA 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs CYFIRMA 6). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: feedly.com/threat-intelligence
- 8
Halo Security
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as CYFIRMA). Scores higher than CYFIRMA in third-party risk (4 vs CYFIRMA 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs CYFIRMA 6).
United States · Website scanned: halosecurity.com
- 9
watchTowr
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as CYFIRMA). Scores higher than CYFIRMA in third-party risk (4 vs CYFIRMA 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs CYFIRMA 6).
Singapore · Website scanned: watchtowr.com
- 10
Zynap
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as CYFIRMA). Scores higher than CYFIRMA in third-party risk (2 vs CYFIRMA 0) and attack surface management (6 vs CYFIRMA 4). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs CYFIRMA 6).
Spain · Website scanned: zynap.com
CYFIRMA vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | CYFIRMA | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 15.8 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 69th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 6 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 4 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Singapore | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.