Feedly alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Feedly is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence. Its overall score is 15.8 out of 100, ranking 69th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 15.8 / 100 · 69th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 2 / 10 · 38th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 2 / 10 · 42nd of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · 44th of 98
- API
- 10 / 10 · Public documentation
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence
- Website scanned
- feedly.com/threat-intelligence
- Recorded during scanning
- The content in the embedded frame on the homepage could not be read; the assessment was conducted using the use-case pages.
Feedly score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 2 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 2 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 10 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Feedly ranks 69th among 100 providers with an overall score of 15.8, placing it in the lower half. It shares the same overall score with TrySec, ReliaQuest, CYFIRMA and 3 more providers. The next score up belongs to SOS Intelligence and Hold Security (16.4, 0.6 points higher). The next score down belongs to Kaduu (13.9, 1.9 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 25th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 28.9 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 24th; the closest scores in that list belong to ReliaQuest (15.8) and Halo Security (15.8).
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 15.8, 10.5 points come from the four product categories and 5.3 from the API score. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.
It does not score above the average of 98 providers in any of the four product categories. It falls furthest below the average in phishing and brand protection: 2 / 10 against 3.7. Its best category rank is in third-party risk: 38th, shared with 15 providers.
Its category, API and infostealer scores are identical to those of ReliaQuest.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in executive protection.
- Third-party risk: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- Phishing and brand protection: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Feedly’s highest-scoring category (attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Feedly.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- SwordSec18.4
- Feedly15.8
- TrySec15.8
- ReliaQuest15.8
- CYFIRMA15.8
- Halo Security15.8
- watchTowr15.8
- Zynap15.8
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 78.2 points above Feedly). Scores higher than Feedly in third-party risk (9 vs Feedly 2), phishing and brand protection (9 vs Feedly 2), executive protection (9 vs Feedly 0) and attack surface management (9 vs Feedly 4).
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 56.5 points above Feedly). Scores higher than Feedly in third-party risk (10 vs Feedly 2), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Feedly 2), executive protection (8 vs Feedly 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Feedly 4).
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 54.1 points above Feedly). Scores higher than Feedly in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Feedly 2), executive protection (10 vs Feedly 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Feedly 4). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs Feedly 2).
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
SwordSec
Overall score 18.4 (59th; 2.6 points above Feedly). Scores higher than Feedly in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Feedly 2) and attack surface management (6 vs Feedly 4). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs Feedly 2). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: swordsec.com
- 5
TrySec
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as Feedly). Scores higher than Feedly in phishing and brand protection (4 vs Feedly 2) and attack surface management (8 vs Feedly 4). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs Feedly 2). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: trysec.com
- 6
ReliaQuest
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as Feedly). Scores are equal in the categories that could be compared.
United States · Website scanned: reliaquest.com
- 7
CYFIRMA
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as Feedly). Scores higher than Feedly in phishing and brand protection (6 vs Feedly 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs Feedly 2). API: behind a login or contract.
Singapore · Website scanned: cyfirma.com
- 8
Halo Security
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as Feedly). Scores higher than Feedly in third-party risk (4 vs Feedly 2). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: halosecurity.com
- 9
watchTowr
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as Feedly). Scores higher than Feedly in third-party risk (4 vs Feedly 2). API: behind a login or contract.
Singapore · Website scanned: watchtowr.com
- 10
Zynap
Overall score 15.8 (69th; same as Feedly). Scores higher than Feedly in attack surface management (6 vs Feedly 4). API: behind a login or contract.
Spain · Website scanned: zynap.com
Feedly vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | Feedly | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 15.8 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 69th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 2 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 2 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 4 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.