PRODAFT alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
PRODAFT is a provider headquartered in Switzerland and was included in this comparison through Türkiye-linked providers. Its overall score is 13.2 out of 100, ranking 77th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 13.2 / 100 · 77th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 4 / 10 · 25th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 4 / 10 · 35th of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · 68th of 98
- API
- 0 / 10 · No documentation found
- Country
- Switzerland
- Selection source
- Türkiye-linked providers
- Website scanned
- prodaft.com
- Recorded during scanning
- The home page loaded empty; the /about page was scanned with an 8-second wait.
- Country information source
- Country information source: company website.
PRODAFT score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 4 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 4 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 0 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
PRODAFT ranks 77th among 100 providers with an overall score of 13.2, placing it in the bottom quarter. It shares the same overall score with VulnHero, CrowdStrike, QuoIntelligence and 1 more provider. The next score up belongs to Kaduu (13.9, 0.7 points higher). The next score down belongs to Seccops (CyberThint), Barikat, OctoXLabs and 6 more providers (10.5, 2.7 points lower).
Among the 24 providers selected through the same source (Türkiye-linked providers), it ranks 10th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Dark Radar (94.0), 80.8 points above. Among the 3 providers headquartered in Switzerland it ranks 3rd; the closest scores in that list belong to Kaduu (13.9) and ImmuniWeb (44.7).
Because it is not in the index and no API documentation was found, its entire overall score of 13.2 comes from the four product categories. It is one of 30 providers for which no API documentation was found.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 2 of the four product categories: third-party risk and phishing and brand protection. Its strongest category relative to the average is third-party risk: 4 / 10 against an average of 2.8. It falls furthest below the average in attack surface management: 2 / 10 against 4.9. Its best category rank is in third-party risk: 25th, shared with 12 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to QuoIntelligence: overall score 13.2, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in executive protection.
- Third-party risk: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- Phishing and brand protection: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- No API documentation was found on the website or in search results.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in PRODAFT’s highest-scoring categories (third-party risk and phishing and brand protection): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to PRODAFT.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- Flare65.8
- ReliaQuest15.8
- Feedly15.8
- Halo Security15.8
- watchTowr15.8
- Zynap15.8
- PRODAFT13.2
- QuoIntelligence13.2
- Barikat10.5
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 80.8 points above PRODAFT). Scores higher than PRODAFT in third-party risk (9 vs PRODAFT 4), phishing and brand protection (9 vs PRODAFT 4), executive protection (9 vs PRODAFT 0) and attack surface management (9 vs PRODAFT 2). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 59.1 points above PRODAFT). Scores higher than PRODAFT in third-party risk (10 vs PRODAFT 4), phishing and brand protection (10 vs PRODAFT 4), executive protection (8 vs PRODAFT 0) and attack surface management (8 vs PRODAFT 2). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
Flare
Overall score 65.8 (4th; 52.6 points above PRODAFT). Scores higher than PRODAFT in phishing and brand protection (8 vs PRODAFT 4) and executive protection (8 vs PRODAFT 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (0 vs PRODAFT 2). API: public documentation.
Canada · Website scanned: flare.io
- 4
ReliaQuest
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above PRODAFT). Scores higher than PRODAFT in attack surface management (4 vs PRODAFT 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs PRODAFT 4) and phishing and brand protection (2 vs PRODAFT 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: reliaquest.com
- 5
Feedly
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above PRODAFT). Scores higher than PRODAFT in attack surface management (4 vs PRODAFT 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs PRODAFT 4) and phishing and brand protection (2 vs PRODAFT 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: feedly.com/threat-intelligence
- 6
Halo Security
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above PRODAFT). Scores higher than PRODAFT in attack surface management (4 vs PRODAFT 2). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs PRODAFT 4). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: halosecurity.com
- 7
watchTowr
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above PRODAFT). Scores higher than PRODAFT in attack surface management (4 vs PRODAFT 2). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs PRODAFT 4). API: behind a login or contract.
Singapore · Website scanned: watchtowr.com
- 8
Zynap
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above PRODAFT). Scores higher than PRODAFT in attack surface management (6 vs PRODAFT 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs PRODAFT 4) and phishing and brand protection (2 vs PRODAFT 4). API: behind a login or contract.
Spain · Website scanned: zynap.com
- 9
QuoIntelligence
Overall score 13.2 (77th; same as PRODAFT). Scores higher than PRODAFT in attack surface management (4 vs PRODAFT 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs PRODAFT 4).
Germany · Website scanned: quointelligence.eu
- 10
Barikat
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; 2.7 points below PRODAFT). Scores higher than PRODAFT in attack surface management (4 vs PRODAFT 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs PRODAFT 4) and phishing and brand protection (2 vs PRODAFT 4).
Türkiye · Website scanned: barikat.com.tr
PRODAFT vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and Flare
| Criterion | PRODAFT | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | Flare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 13.2 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 65.8 |
| Overall rank | 77th | 1st | 2nd | 4th |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 81.2 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 7 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 8 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 9 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 9 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| Third-party risk | 4 | 9 | 10 | 4 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 4 | 9 | 10 | 8 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| Attack surface management | 2 | 9 | 8 | 0 |
| API | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Switzerland | Türkiye | United States | Canada |
| Selection source | Türkiye-linked providers | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.