Seccops (CyberThint) alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Seccops (CyberThint) is a provider headquartered in Türkiye and was included in this comparison through Türkiye-linked providers. Its overall score is 10.5 out of 100, ranking 82nd among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 10.5 / 100 · 82nd of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 4 / 10 · 35th of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · 44th of 98
- API
- 0 / 10 · No documentation found
- Country
- Türkiye
- Selection source
- Türkiye-linked providers
- Website scanned
- seccops.com
Seccops (CyberThint) score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 4 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 0 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Seccops (CyberThint) ranks 82nd among 100 providers with an overall score of 10.5, placing it in the bottom quarter. It shares the same overall score with Barikat, OctoXLabs, Google (Mandiant) and 5 more providers. The next score up belongs to VulnHero, PRODAFT, CrowdStrike and 2 more providers (13.2, 2.7 points higher). The next score down belongs to CenterOnDigital, Cylana and CatchProbe (7.9, 2.6 points lower).
Among the 24 providers selected through the same source (Türkiye-linked providers), it ranks 12th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Dark Radar (94.0), 83.5 points above. Among the 23 providers headquartered in Türkiye it ranks 12th; the closest scores in that list belong to VulnHero (13.2) and Barikat (10.5).
Because it is not in the index and no API documentation was found, its entire overall score of 10.5 comes from the four product categories. It is one of 30 providers for which no API documentation was found.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 1 of the four product categories: phishing and brand protection. Its strongest category relative to the average is phishing and brand protection: 4 / 10 against an average of 3.7. It falls furthest below the average in third-party risk: 0 / 10 against 2.8. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 35th, shared with 6 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to these 3 providers: QuoIntelligence, CenterOnDigital and Cylana; the first has an overall score of 13.2, with the same score in 3 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk and executive protection.
- Phishing and brand protection: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- No API documentation was found on the website or in search results.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Seccops (CyberThint)’s highest-scoring categories (phishing and brand protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Seccops (CyberThint).
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- PRODAFT13.2
- Seccops (CyberThint)10.5
- Barikat10.5
- Cognyte10.5
- WithSecure10.5
- CenterOnDigital7.9
- Cylana7.9
- CatchProbe7.9
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 83.5 points above Seccops (CyberThint)). Scores higher than Seccops (CyberThint) in third-party risk (9 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4), executive protection (9 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 0) and attack surface management (9 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 61.8 points above Seccops (CyberThint)). Scores higher than Seccops (CyberThint) in third-party risk (10 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4), executive protection (8 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 59.4 points above Seccops (CyberThint)). Scores higher than Seccops (CyberThint) in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4), executive protection (10 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
PRODAFT
Overall score 13.2 (77th; 2.7 points above Seccops (CyberThint)). Scores higher than Seccops (CyberThint) in third-party risk (4 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (2 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4).
Switzerland · Website scanned: prodaft.com
- 5
Barikat
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as Seccops (CyberThint)). Scores higher than Seccops (CyberThint) in third-party risk (2 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4).
Türkiye · Website scanned: barikat.com.tr
- 6
Cognyte
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as Seccops (CyberThint)). Scores higher than Seccops (CyberThint) in executive protection (2 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 0). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4).
Israel · Website scanned: cognyte.com
- 7
WithSecure
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as Seccops (CyberThint)). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4) and attack surface management (2 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4). API: public documentation.
Finland · Website scanned: withsecure.com
- 8
CenterOnDigital
Overall score 7.9 (91st; 2.6 points below Seccops (CyberThint)). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4).
Türkiye · Website scanned: centerondigital.com
- 9
Cylana
Overall score 7.9 (91st; 2.6 points below Seccops (CyberThint)). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4).
Türkiye · Website scanned: cylana.io
- 10
CatchProbe
Overall score 7.9 (91st; 2.6 points below Seccops (CyberThint)). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4) and attack surface management (2 vs Seccops (CyberThint) 4). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: catchprobe.com
Seccops (CyberThint) vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | Seccops (CyberThint) | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 10.5 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 82nd | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 4 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 4 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Türkiye | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Türkiye-linked providers | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.