OctoXLabs alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
OctoXLabs is a provider headquartered in Türkiye and was included in this comparison through Türkiye-linked providers. Its overall score is 10.5 out of 100, ranking 82nd among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 10.5 / 100 · 82nd of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · 61st of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · 44th of 98
- API
- 10 / 10 · Public documentation
- Country
- Türkiye
- Selection source
- Türkiye-linked providers
- Website scanned
- octoxlabs.com
OctoXLabs score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 10 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
OctoXLabs ranks 82nd among 100 providers with an overall score of 10.5, placing it in the bottom quarter. It shares the same overall score with Seccops (CyberThint), Barikat, Google (Mandiant) and 5 more providers. The next score up belongs to VulnHero, PRODAFT, CrowdStrike and 2 more providers (13.2, 2.7 points higher). The next score down belongs to CenterOnDigital, Cylana and CatchProbe (7.9, 2.6 points lower).
Among the 24 providers selected through the same source (Türkiye-linked providers), it ranks 12th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Dark Radar (94.0), 83.5 points above. Among the 23 providers headquartered in Türkiye it ranks 12th; the closest scores in that list belong to Barikat (10.5) and CenterOnDigital (7.9).
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 10.5, 5.2 points come from the four product categories and 5.3 from the API score. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.
It does not score above the average of 98 providers in any of the four product categories. It falls furthest below the average in phishing and brand protection: 0 / 10 against 3.7. Its best category rank is in attack surface management: 44th, shared with 23 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to these 4 providers: ReliaQuest, Feedly, Google (Mandiant) and 1 more provider; the first has an overall score of 15.8, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk, phishing and brand protection and executive protection.
- Attack surface management: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in OctoXLabs’s highest-scoring category (attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to OctoXLabs.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- OctoXLabs10.5
- Seccops (CyberThint)10.5
- Barikat10.5
- Google (Mandiant)10.5
- Cognyte10.5
- Silobreaker10.5
- Element Security10.5
- WithSecure10.5
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 83.5 points above OctoXLabs). Scores higher than OctoXLabs in third-party risk (9 vs OctoXLabs 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs OctoXLabs 0), executive protection (9 vs OctoXLabs 0) and attack surface management (9 vs OctoXLabs 4).
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 61.8 points above OctoXLabs). Scores higher than OctoXLabs in third-party risk (10 vs OctoXLabs 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs OctoXLabs 0), executive protection (8 vs OctoXLabs 0) and attack surface management (8 vs OctoXLabs 4).
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 59.4 points above OctoXLabs). Scores higher than OctoXLabs in phishing and brand protection (10 vs OctoXLabs 0), executive protection (10 vs OctoXLabs 0) and attack surface management (8 vs OctoXLabs 4).
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
Seccops (CyberThint)
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as OctoXLabs). Scores higher than OctoXLabs in phishing and brand protection (4 vs OctoXLabs 0). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: seccops.com
- 5
Barikat
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as OctoXLabs). Scores higher than OctoXLabs in third-party risk (2 vs OctoXLabs 0) and phishing and brand protection (2 vs OctoXLabs 0). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: barikat.com.tr
- 6
Google (Mandiant)
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as OctoXLabs). Scores higher than OctoXLabs in third-party risk (2 vs OctoXLabs 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (2 vs OctoXLabs 4).
United States · Website scanned: cloud.google.com/security/products/threat-intelligence
- 7
Cognyte
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as OctoXLabs). Scores higher than OctoXLabs in phishing and brand protection (2 vs OctoXLabs 0) and executive protection (2 vs OctoXLabs 0). API: no documentation found.
Israel · Website scanned: cognyte.com
- 8
Silobreaker
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as OctoXLabs). Scores higher than OctoXLabs in third-party risk (4 vs OctoXLabs 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (2 vs OctoXLabs 4). API: behind a login or contract.
United Kingdom · Website scanned: silobreaker.com
- 9
Element Security
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as OctoXLabs). Scores higher than OctoXLabs in attack surface management (8 vs OctoXLabs 4). API: no documentation found.
Israel · Website scanned: element.security
- 10
WithSecure
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as OctoXLabs). Scores higher than OctoXLabs in phishing and brand protection (2 vs OctoXLabs 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (2 vs OctoXLabs 4).
Finland · Website scanned: withsecure.com
OctoXLabs vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | OctoXLabs | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 10.5 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 82nd | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 0 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 4 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Türkiye | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Türkiye-linked providers | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.