Google (Mandiant) alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Google (Mandiant) is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, attack surface. Its overall score is 10.5 out of 100, ranking 82nd among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 10.5 / 100 · 82nd of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 2 / 10 · 38th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · 61st of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · 68th of 98
- API
- 10 / 10 · Public documentation
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, attack surface
- Website scanned
- cloud.google.com/security/products/threat-intelligence
Google (Mandiant) score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 2 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 10 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Google (Mandiant) ranks 82nd among 100 providers with an overall score of 10.5, placing it in the bottom quarter. It shares the same overall score with Seccops (CyberThint), Barikat, OctoXLabs and 5 more providers. The next score up belongs to VulnHero, PRODAFT, CrowdStrike and 2 more providers (13.2, 2.7 points higher). The next score down belongs to CenterOnDigital, Cylana and CatchProbe (7.9, 2.6 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 34th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 34.2 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 29th; the closest scores in that list belong to Intel 471 (13.2) and Prevalent (Mitratech) (10.5).
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 10.5, 5.2 points come from the four product categories and 5.3 from the API score. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.
It does not score above the average of 98 providers in any of the four product categories. It falls furthest below the average in phishing and brand protection: 0 / 10 against 3.7. Its best category rank is in third-party risk: 38th, shared with 15 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to these 4 providers: ReliaQuest, Feedly, OctoXLabs and 1 more provider; the first has an overall score of 15.8, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in phishing and brand protection and executive protection.
- Third-party risk: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Google (Mandiant)’s highest-scoring categories (third-party risk and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Google (Mandiant).
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- Cyble64.8
- PRODAFT13.2
- CrowdStrike13.2
- QuoIntelligence13.2
- Intel 47113.2
- Google (Mandiant)10.5
- Barikat10.5
- Silobreaker10.5
- Prevalent (Mitratech)10.5
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 83.5 points above Google (Mandiant)). Scores higher than Google (Mandiant) in third-party risk (9 vs Google (Mandiant) 2), phishing and brand protection (9 vs Google (Mandiant) 0), executive protection (9 vs Google (Mandiant) 0) and attack surface management (9 vs Google (Mandiant) 2).
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 61.8 points above Google (Mandiant)). Scores higher than Google (Mandiant) in third-party risk (10 vs Google (Mandiant) 2), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Google (Mandiant) 0), executive protection (8 vs Google (Mandiant) 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Google (Mandiant) 2).
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
Cyble
Overall score 64.8 (5th; 54.3 points above Google (Mandiant)). Scores higher than Google (Mandiant) in third-party risk (4 vs Google (Mandiant) 2), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Google (Mandiant) 0), executive protection (10 vs Google (Mandiant) 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Google (Mandiant) 2). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: cyble.com
- 4
PRODAFT
Overall score 13.2 (77th; 2.7 points above Google (Mandiant)). Scores higher than Google (Mandiant) in third-party risk (4 vs Google (Mandiant) 2) and phishing and brand protection (4 vs Google (Mandiant) 0). API: no documentation found.
Switzerland · Website scanned: prodaft.com
- 5
CrowdStrike
Overall score 13.2 (77th; 2.7 points above Google (Mandiant)). Scores higher than Google (Mandiant) in third-party risk (4 vs Google (Mandiant) 2) and attack surface management (4 vs Google (Mandiant) 2). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: crowdstrike.com
- 6
QuoIntelligence
Overall score 13.2 (77th; 2.7 points above Google (Mandiant)). Scores higher than Google (Mandiant) in phishing and brand protection (4 vs Google (Mandiant) 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Google (Mandiant) 2). API: no documentation found.
Germany · Website scanned: quointelligence.eu
- 7
Intel 471
Overall score 13.2 (77th; 2.7 points above Google (Mandiant)). Scores higher than Google (Mandiant) in third-party risk (6 vs Google (Mandiant) 2). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: intel471.com
- 8
Barikat
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as Google (Mandiant)). Scores higher than Google (Mandiant) in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Google (Mandiant) 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Google (Mandiant) 2). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: barikat.com.tr
- 9
Silobreaker
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as Google (Mandiant)). Scores higher than Google (Mandiant) in third-party risk (4 vs Google (Mandiant) 2). API: behind a login or contract.
United Kingdom · Website scanned: silobreaker.com
- 10
Prevalent (Mitratech)
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as Google (Mandiant)). Scores higher than Google (Mandiant) in third-party risk (4 vs Google (Mandiant) 2). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: mitratech.com/products/prevalent
Google (Mandiant) vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and Cyble
| Criterion | Google (Mandiant) | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | Cyble |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 10.5 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 64.8 |
| Overall rank | 82nd | 1st | 2nd | 5th |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 47.7 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 4 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 3 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 3 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 8 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 2 | 9 | 10 | 4 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 0 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 2 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | United States |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, attack surface | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.