QuoIntelligence alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
QuoIntelligence is a provider headquartered in Germany and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence. Its overall score is 13.2 out of 100, ranking 77th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 13.2 / 100 · 77th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 2 / 10 · 38th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 4 / 10 · 35th of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · 44th of 98
- API
- 0 / 10 · No documentation found
- Country
- Germany
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence
- Website scanned
- quointelligence.eu
- Country information source
- Country information source: company website.
QuoIntelligence score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 2 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 4 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 0 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
QuoIntelligence ranks 77th among 100 providers with an overall score of 13.2, placing it in the bottom quarter. It shares the same overall score with VulnHero, PRODAFT, CrowdStrike and 1 more provider. The next score up belongs to Kaduu (13.9, 0.7 points higher). The next score down belongs to Seccops (CyberThint), Barikat, OctoXLabs and 6 more providers (10.5, 2.7 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 31st. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 31.5 points above. It is the only provider in the comparison headquartered in Germany.
Because it is not in the index and no API documentation was found, its entire overall score of 13.2 comes from the four product categories. It is one of 30 providers for which no API documentation was found.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 1 of the four product categories: phishing and brand protection. Its strongest category relative to the average is phishing and brand protection: 4 / 10 against an average of 3.7. It falls furthest below the average in executive protection: 0 / 10 against 1.6. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 35th, shared with 6 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to these 2 providers: Seccops (CyberThint) and Barikat; the first has an overall score of 10.5, with the same score in 3 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in executive protection.
- Third-party risk: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- Phishing and brand protection: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- No API documentation was found on the website or in search results.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in QuoIntelligence’s highest-scoring categories (phishing and brand protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to QuoIntelligence.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- TrySec15.8
- ReliaQuest15.8
- CYFIRMA15.8
- Feedly15.8
- Halo Security15.8
- watchTowr15.8
- QuoIntelligence13.2
- PRODAFT13.2
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 80.8 points above QuoIntelligence). Scores higher than QuoIntelligence in third-party risk (9 vs QuoIntelligence 2), phishing and brand protection (9 vs QuoIntelligence 4), executive protection (9 vs QuoIntelligence 0) and attack surface management (9 vs QuoIntelligence 4). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 59.1 points above QuoIntelligence). Scores higher than QuoIntelligence in third-party risk (10 vs QuoIntelligence 2), phishing and brand protection (10 vs QuoIntelligence 4), executive protection (8 vs QuoIntelligence 0) and attack surface management (8 vs QuoIntelligence 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 56.7 points above QuoIntelligence). Scores higher than QuoIntelligence in phishing and brand protection (10 vs QuoIntelligence 4), executive protection (10 vs QuoIntelligence 0) and attack surface management (8 vs QuoIntelligence 4). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs QuoIntelligence 2). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
TrySec
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above QuoIntelligence). Scores higher than QuoIntelligence in attack surface management (8 vs QuoIntelligence 4). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs QuoIntelligence 2).
Türkiye · Website scanned: trysec.com
- 5
ReliaQuest
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above QuoIntelligence). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs QuoIntelligence 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: reliaquest.com
- 6
CYFIRMA
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above QuoIntelligence). Scores higher than QuoIntelligence in phishing and brand protection (6 vs QuoIntelligence 4). Scores lower in third-party risk (0 vs QuoIntelligence 2). API: behind a login or contract.
Singapore · Website scanned: cyfirma.com
- 7
Feedly
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above QuoIntelligence). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs QuoIntelligence 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: feedly.com/threat-intelligence
- 8
Halo Security
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above QuoIntelligence). Scores higher than QuoIntelligence in third-party risk (4 vs QuoIntelligence 2). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs QuoIntelligence 4). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: halosecurity.com
- 9
watchTowr
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above QuoIntelligence). Scores higher than QuoIntelligence in third-party risk (4 vs QuoIntelligence 2). Scores lower in phishing and brand protection (2 vs QuoIntelligence 4). API: behind a login or contract.
Singapore · Website scanned: watchtowr.com
- 10
PRODAFT
Overall score 13.2 (77th; same as QuoIntelligence). Scores higher than QuoIntelligence in third-party risk (4 vs QuoIntelligence 2). Scores lower in attack surface management (2 vs QuoIntelligence 4).
Switzerland · Website scanned: prodaft.com
QuoIntelligence vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | QuoIntelligence | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 13.2 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 77th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 2 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 4 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 4 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Germany | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.