Intel 471 alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Intel 471 is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence. Its overall score is 13.2 out of 100, ranking 77th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 13.2 / 100 · 77th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 6 / 10 · 18th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · 61st of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · 68th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract (documentation behind login)
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence
- Website scanned
- intel471.com
Intel 471 score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 6 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Intel 471 ranks 77th among 100 providers with an overall score of 13.2, placing it in the bottom quarter. It shares the same overall score with VulnHero, PRODAFT, CrowdStrike and 1 more provider. The next score up belongs to Kaduu (13.9, 0.7 points higher). The next score down belongs to Seccops (CyberThint), Barikat, OctoXLabs and 6 more providers (10.5, 2.7 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 31st. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 31.5 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 27th; the closest scores in that list belong to CrowdStrike (13.2) and Google (Mandiant) (10.5).
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 13.2, 10.6 points come from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract (documentation behind login).
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 1 of the four product categories: third-party risk. Its strongest category relative to the average is third-party risk: 6 / 10 against an average of 2.8. It falls furthest below the average in phishing and brand protection: 0 / 10 against 3.7. Its best category rank is in third-party risk: 18th, shared with 5 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to these 2 providers: Silobreaker and Prevalent (Mitratech); the first has an overall score of 10.5, with the same score in 3 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in phishing and brand protection and executive protection.
- Third-party risk: 3 of five capabilities identified (6 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Intel 471’s strongest categories (third-party risk): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Intel 471.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- Flare65.8
- ReliaQuest15.8
- Feedly15.8
- Halo Security15.8
- watchTowr15.8
- Intel 47113.2
- PRODAFT13.2
- CrowdStrike13.2
- QuoIntelligence13.2
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 80.8 points above Intel 471). Scores higher than Intel 471 in third-party risk (9 vs Intel 471 6), phishing and brand protection (9 vs Intel 471 0), executive protection (9 vs Intel 471 0) and attack surface management (9 vs Intel 471 2). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 59.1 points above Intel 471). Scores higher than Intel 471 in third-party risk (10 vs Intel 471 6), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Intel 471 0), executive protection (8 vs Intel 471 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Intel 471 2). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
Flare
Overall score 65.8 (4th; 52.6 points above Intel 471). Scores higher than Intel 471 in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Intel 471 0) and executive protection (8 vs Intel 471 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (4 vs Intel 471 6) and attack surface management (0 vs Intel 471 2). API: public documentation.
Canada · Website scanned: flare.io
- 4
ReliaQuest
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above Intel 471). Scores higher than Intel 471 in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Intel 471 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Intel 471 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs Intel 471 6). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: reliaquest.com
- 5
Feedly
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above Intel 471). Scores higher than Intel 471 in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Intel 471 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Intel 471 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs Intel 471 6). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: feedly.com/threat-intelligence
- 6
Halo Security
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above Intel 471). Scores higher than Intel 471 in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Intel 471 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Intel 471 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (4 vs Intel 471 6).
United States · Website scanned: halosecurity.com
- 7
watchTowr
Overall score 15.8 (69th; 2.6 points above Intel 471). Scores higher than Intel 471 in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Intel 471 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Intel 471 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (4 vs Intel 471 6).
Singapore · Website scanned: watchtowr.com
- 8
PRODAFT
Overall score 13.2 (77th; same as Intel 471). Scores higher than Intel 471 in phishing and brand protection (4 vs Intel 471 0). Scores lower in third-party risk (4 vs Intel 471 6). API: no documentation found.
Switzerland · Website scanned: prodaft.com
- 9
CrowdStrike
Overall score 13.2 (77th; same as Intel 471). Scores higher than Intel 471 in attack surface management (4 vs Intel 471 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (4 vs Intel 471 6).
United States · Website scanned: crowdstrike.com
- 10
QuoIntelligence
Overall score 13.2 (77th; same as Intel 471). Scores higher than Intel 471 in phishing and brand protection (4 vs Intel 471 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Intel 471 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs Intel 471 6). API: no documentation found.
Germany · Website scanned: quointelligence.eu
Intel 471 vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and Flare
| Criterion | Intel 471 | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | Flare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 13.2 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 65.8 |
| Overall rank | 77th | 1st | 2nd | 4th |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 81.2 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 7 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 8 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 9 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 9 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| Third-party risk | 6 | 9 | 10 | 4 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 0 | 9 | 10 | 8 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| Attack surface management | 2 | 9 | 8 | 0 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | Canada |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, threat intelligence | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.