Prevalent (Mitratech) alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Prevalent (Mitratech) is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through Forrester Wave, security ratings. Its overall score is 10.5 out of 100, ranking 82nd among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 10.5 / 100 · 82nd of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 4 / 10 · 25th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · 61st of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · 68th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- Forrester Wave, security ratings
- Website scanned
- mitratech.com/products/prevalent
Prevalent (Mitratech) score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 4 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Prevalent (Mitratech) ranks 82nd among 100 providers with an overall score of 10.5, placing it in the bottom quarter. It shares the same overall score with Seccops (CyberThint), Barikat, OctoXLabs and 5 more providers. The next score up belongs to VulnHero, PRODAFT, CrowdStrike and 2 more providers (13.2, 2.7 points higher). The next score down belongs to CenterOnDigital, Cylana and CatchProbe (7.9, 2.6 points lower).
Among the 4 providers selected through the same source (Forrester Wave), it ranks 4th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to UpGuard (36.8), 26.3 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 29th; the closest scores in that list belong to Google (Mandiant) (10.5) and CatchProbe (7.9).
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 10.5, 7.9 points come from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.
It scores above the average of 98 providers in 1 of the four product categories: third-party risk. Its strongest category relative to the average is third-party risk: 4 / 10 against an average of 2.8. It falls furthest below the average in phishing and brand protection: 0 / 10 against 3.7. Its best category rank is in third-party risk: 25th, shared with 12 providers.
Its category, API and infostealer scores are identical to those of Silobreaker.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in phishing and brand protection and executive protection.
- Third-party risk: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Prevalent (Mitratech)’s highest-scoring category (third-party risk): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Prevalent (Mitratech).
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- Flare65.8
- PRODAFT13.2
- CrowdStrike13.2
- QuoIntelligence13.2
- Intel 47113.2
- Prevalent (Mitratech)10.5
- Barikat10.5
- Google (Mandiant)10.5
- Silobreaker10.5
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 83.5 points above Prevalent (Mitratech)). Scores higher than Prevalent (Mitratech) in third-party risk (9 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 4), phishing and brand protection (9 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 0), executive protection (9 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 0) and attack surface management (9 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 2). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 61.8 points above Prevalent (Mitratech)). Scores higher than Prevalent (Mitratech) in third-party risk (10 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 4), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 0), executive protection (8 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 2). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
Flare
Overall score 65.8 (4th; 55.3 points above Prevalent (Mitratech)). Scores higher than Prevalent (Mitratech) in phishing and brand protection (8 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 0) and executive protection (8 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (0 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 2). API: public documentation.
Canada · Website scanned: flare.io
- 4
PRODAFT
Overall score 13.2 (77th; 2.7 points above Prevalent (Mitratech)). Scores higher than Prevalent (Mitratech) in phishing and brand protection (4 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 0). API: no documentation found.
Switzerland · Website scanned: prodaft.com
- 5
CrowdStrike
Overall score 13.2 (77th; 2.7 points above Prevalent (Mitratech)). Scores higher than Prevalent (Mitratech) in attack surface management (4 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 2).
United States · Website scanned: crowdstrike.com
- 6
QuoIntelligence
Overall score 13.2 (77th; 2.7 points above Prevalent (Mitratech)). Scores higher than Prevalent (Mitratech) in phishing and brand protection (4 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 4). API: no documentation found.
Germany · Website scanned: quointelligence.eu
- 7
Intel 471
Overall score 13.2 (77th; 2.7 points above Prevalent (Mitratech)). Scores higher than Prevalent (Mitratech) in third-party risk (6 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 4).
United States · Website scanned: intel471.com
- 8
Barikat
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as Prevalent (Mitratech)). Scores higher than Prevalent (Mitratech) in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 0) and attack surface management (4 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 2). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 4). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: barikat.com.tr
- 9
Google (Mandiant)
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as Prevalent (Mitratech)). Scores lower in third-party risk (2 vs Prevalent (Mitratech) 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: cloud.google.com/security/products/threat-intelligence
- 10
Silobreaker
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as Prevalent (Mitratech)). Scores are equal in the categories that could be compared.
United Kingdom · Website scanned: silobreaker.com
Prevalent (Mitratech) vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and Flare
| Criterion | Prevalent (Mitratech) | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | Flare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 10.5 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 65.8 |
| Overall rank | 82nd | 1st | 2nd | 4th |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 81.2 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 7 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 8 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 9 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 9 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| Third-party risk | 4 | 9 | 10 | 4 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 0 | 9 | 10 | 8 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| Attack surface management | 2 | 9 | 8 | 0 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | Canada |
| Selection source | Forrester Wave, security ratings | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.