WithSecure alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
WithSecure is a provider headquartered in Finland and was included in this comparison through Gartner Peer Insights, attack surface. Its overall score is 10.5 out of 100, ranking 82nd among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 10.5 / 100 · 82nd of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 2 / 10 · 42nd of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · 68th of 98
- API
- 10 / 10 · Public documentation (connect.withsecure.com)
- Country
- Finland
- Selection source
- Gartner Peer Insights, attack surface
- Website scanned
- withsecure.com
- Recorded during scanning
- The homepage and the platform/xm page were reviewed.
WithSecure score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 2 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 10 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
WithSecure ranks 82nd among 100 providers with an overall score of 10.5, placing it in the bottom quarter. It shares the same overall score with Seccops (CyberThint), Barikat, OctoXLabs and 5 more providers. The next score up belongs to VulnHero, PRODAFT, CrowdStrike and 2 more providers (13.2, 2.7 points higher). The next score down belongs to CenterOnDigital, Cylana and CatchProbe (7.9, 2.6 points lower).
Among the 38 providers selected through the same source (Gartner Peer Insights), it ranks 34th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to ImmuniWeb (44.7), 34.2 points above. It is the only provider in the comparison headquartered in Finland.
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 10.5, 5.2 points come from the four product categories and 5.3 from the API score. It is one of 37 providers with public API documentation.
It does not score above the average of 98 providers in any of the four product categories. It falls furthest below the average in attack surface management: 2 / 10 against 4.9. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 42nd, shared with 18 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to these 4 providers: ReliaQuest, Feedly, OctoXLabs and 1 more provider; the first has an overall score of 15.8, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk and executive protection.
- Phishing and brand protection: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in WithSecure’s highest-scoring categories (phishing and brand protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to WithSecure.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- PRODAFT13.2
- WithSecure10.5
- Seccops (CyberThint)10.5
- Barikat10.5
- Cognyte10.5
- CenterOnDigital7.9
- Cylana7.9
- CatchProbe7.9
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 83.5 points above WithSecure). Scores higher than WithSecure in third-party risk (9 vs WithSecure 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs WithSecure 2), executive protection (9 vs WithSecure 0) and attack surface management (9 vs WithSecure 2).
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 61.8 points above WithSecure). Scores higher than WithSecure in third-party risk (10 vs WithSecure 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs WithSecure 2), executive protection (8 vs WithSecure 0) and attack surface management (8 vs WithSecure 2).
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 59.4 points above WithSecure). Scores higher than WithSecure in phishing and brand protection (10 vs WithSecure 2), executive protection (10 vs WithSecure 0) and attack surface management (8 vs WithSecure 2).
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
PRODAFT
Overall score 13.2 (77th; 2.7 points above WithSecure). Scores higher than WithSecure in third-party risk (4 vs WithSecure 0) and phishing and brand protection (4 vs WithSecure 2). API: no documentation found.
Switzerland · Website scanned: prodaft.com
- 5
Seccops (CyberThint)
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as WithSecure). Scores higher than WithSecure in phishing and brand protection (4 vs WithSecure 2) and attack surface management (4 vs WithSecure 2). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: seccops.com
- 6
Barikat
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as WithSecure). Scores higher than WithSecure in third-party risk (2 vs WithSecure 0) and attack surface management (4 vs WithSecure 2). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: barikat.com.tr
- 7
Cognyte
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; same as WithSecure). Scores higher than WithSecure in executive protection (2 vs WithSecure 0) and attack surface management (4 vs WithSecure 2). API: no documentation found.
Israel · Website scanned: cognyte.com
- 8
CenterOnDigital
Overall score 7.9 (91st; 2.6 points below WithSecure). Scores higher than WithSecure in attack surface management (4 vs WithSecure 2). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: centerondigital.com
- 9
Cylana
Overall score 7.9 (91st; 2.6 points below WithSecure). Scores higher than WithSecure in attack surface management (4 vs WithSecure 2). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: cylana.io
- 10
CatchProbe
Overall score 7.9 (91st; 2.6 points below WithSecure). Scores are equal in the categories that could be compared. API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: catchprobe.com
WithSecure vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | WithSecure | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 10.5 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 82nd | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 2 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 2 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Finland | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Gartner Peer Insights, attack surface | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.