CatchProbe alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
CatchProbe is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through Türkiye-linked providers. Its overall score is 7.9 out of 100, ranking 91st among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 7.9 / 100 · 91st of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 2 / 10 · 42nd of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · 68th of 98
- API
- 5 / 10 · Behind a login or contract
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- Türkiye-linked providers
- Website scanned
- catchprobe.com
- Recorded during scanning
- Headquartered in San Francisco; founder is Turkish.
- Country information source
- Country information source: company website.
CatchProbe score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 2 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 2 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 5 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
CatchProbe ranks 91st among 100 providers with an overall score of 7.9, placing it in the bottom quarter. It shares the same overall score with CenterOnDigital and Cylana. The next score up belongs to Seccops (CyberThint), Barikat, OctoXLabs and 6 more providers (10.5, 2.6 points higher). The next score down belongs to Secrove, Nebula, C-Prot and 1 more provider (5.3, 2.6 points lower).
Among the 24 providers selected through the same source (Türkiye-linked providers), it ranks 15th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Dark Radar (94.0), 86.1 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 31st; the closest scores in that list belong to Prevalent (Mitratech) (10.5) and Google (Mandiant) (10.5).
Because it is not in the index, the infostealer contribution is 0; of its overall score of 7.9, 5.3 points come from the four product categories and 2.6 from the API score. It is one of 33 providers whose API documentation sits behind a login or contract.
It does not score above the average of 98 providers in any of the four product categories. It falls furthest below the average in attack surface management: 2 / 10 against 4.9. Its best category rank is in phishing and brand protection: 42nd, shared with 18 providers.
Its score distribution is closest to Kaduu: overall score 13.9, with the same score in 2 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk and executive protection.
- Phishing and brand protection: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- Attack surface management: 1 of five capabilities identified (2 / 10).
- API documentation is available behind a login or contract.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in CatchProbe’s highest-scoring categories (phishing and brand protection and attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to CatchProbe.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- PRODAFT13.2
- Seccops (CyberThint)10.5
- Barikat10.5
- Cognyte10.5
- WithSecure10.5
- CatchProbe7.9
- CenterOnDigital7.9
- Cylana7.9
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 86.1 points above CatchProbe). Scores higher than CatchProbe in third-party risk (9 vs CatchProbe 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs CatchProbe 2), executive protection (9 vs CatchProbe 0) and attack surface management (9 vs CatchProbe 2). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 64.4 points above CatchProbe). Scores higher than CatchProbe in third-party risk (10 vs CatchProbe 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs CatchProbe 2), executive protection (8 vs CatchProbe 0) and attack surface management (8 vs CatchProbe 2). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 62.0 points above CatchProbe). Scores higher than CatchProbe in phishing and brand protection (10 vs CatchProbe 2), executive protection (10 vs CatchProbe 0) and attack surface management (8 vs CatchProbe 2). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
PRODAFT
Overall score 13.2 (77th; 5.3 points above CatchProbe). Scores higher than CatchProbe in third-party risk (4 vs CatchProbe 0) and phishing and brand protection (4 vs CatchProbe 2). API: no documentation found.
Switzerland · Website scanned: prodaft.com
- 5
Seccops (CyberThint)
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; 2.6 points above CatchProbe). Scores higher than CatchProbe in phishing and brand protection (4 vs CatchProbe 2) and attack surface management (4 vs CatchProbe 2). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: seccops.com
- 6
Barikat
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; 2.6 points above CatchProbe). Scores higher than CatchProbe in third-party risk (2 vs CatchProbe 0) and attack surface management (4 vs CatchProbe 2). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: barikat.com.tr
- 7
Cognyte
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; 2.6 points above CatchProbe). Scores higher than CatchProbe in executive protection (2 vs CatchProbe 0) and attack surface management (4 vs CatchProbe 2). API: no documentation found.
Israel · Website scanned: cognyte.com
- 8
WithSecure
Overall score 10.5 (82nd; 2.6 points above CatchProbe). Scores are equal in the categories that could be compared. API: public documentation.
Finland · Website scanned: withsecure.com
- 9
CenterOnDigital
Overall score 7.9 (91st; same as CatchProbe). Scores higher than CatchProbe in attack surface management (4 vs CatchProbe 2). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: centerondigital.com
- 10
Cylana
Overall score 7.9 (91st; same as CatchProbe). Scores higher than CatchProbe in attack surface management (4 vs CatchProbe 2). API: no documentation found.
Türkiye · Website scanned: cylana.io
CatchProbe vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | CatchProbe | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 7.9 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 91st | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 2 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 2 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Türkiye-linked providers | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.