Cyberwise alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Cyberwise is a provider headquartered in Türkiye and was included in this comparison through Türkiye-linked providers. Its overall score is 5.3 out of 100, ranking 94th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 5.3 / 100 · 94th of 100
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · 61st of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · 44th of 98
- API
- 0 / 10 · No documentation found
- Country
- Türkiye
- Selection source
- Türkiye-linked providers
- Website scanned
- cyberwise.com
Cyberwise score profile
- Infostealer
- Not in the index
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 4 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 0 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Cyberwise ranks 94th among 100 providers with an overall score of 5.3, placing it in the bottom quarter. It shares the same overall score with Secrove, Nebula and C-Prot. The next score up belongs to CenterOnDigital, Cylana and CatchProbe (7.9, 2.6 points higher). The next score down belongs to LastGuard, Secunnix and SOBE (2.6, 2.7 points lower).
Among the 24 providers selected through the same source (Türkiye-linked providers), it ranks 18th. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Dark Radar (94.0), 88.7 points above. Among the 23 providers headquartered in Türkiye it ranks 17th; the closest scores in that list belong to C-Prot (5.3) and LastGuard (2.6).
Because it is not in the index and no API documentation was found, its entire overall score of 5.3 comes from the four product categories. It is one of 30 providers for which no API documentation was found.
It does not score above the average of 98 providers in any of the four product categories. It falls furthest below the average in phishing and brand protection: 0 / 10 against 3.7. Its best category rank is in attack surface management: 44th, shared with 23 providers.
Its category, API and infostealer scores are identical to those of Secrove, Nebula and C-Prot.
Why look for alternatives
- No infostealer score: the provider is not listed in The Infostealer Index 2026.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk, phishing and brand protection and executive protection.
- Attack surface management: 2 of five capabilities identified (4 / 10).
- No API documentation was found on the website or in search results.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Cyberwise’s highest-scoring category (attack surface management): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Cyberwise.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- CenterOnDigital7.9
- Cylana7.9
- CatchProbe7.9
- Cyberwise5.3
- Secrove5.3
- Nebula5.3
- C-Prot5.3
- LastGuard2.6
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 88.7 points above Cyberwise). Scores higher than Cyberwise in third-party risk (9 vs Cyberwise 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs Cyberwise 0), executive protection (9 vs Cyberwise 0) and attack surface management (9 vs Cyberwise 4). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 67.0 points above Cyberwise). Scores higher than Cyberwise in third-party risk (10 vs Cyberwise 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Cyberwise 0), executive protection (8 vs Cyberwise 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Cyberwise 4). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 64.6 points above Cyberwise). Scores higher than Cyberwise in phishing and brand protection (10 vs Cyberwise 0), executive protection (10 vs Cyberwise 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Cyberwise 4). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
CenterOnDigital
Overall score 7.9 (91st; 2.6 points above Cyberwise). Scores higher than Cyberwise in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Cyberwise 0).
Türkiye · Website scanned: centerondigital.com
- 5
Cylana
Overall score 7.9 (91st; 2.6 points above Cyberwise). Scores higher than Cyberwise in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Cyberwise 0).
Türkiye · Website scanned: cylana.io
- 6
CatchProbe
Overall score 7.9 (91st; 2.6 points above Cyberwise). Scores higher than Cyberwise in phishing and brand protection (2 vs Cyberwise 0). Scores lower in attack surface management (2 vs Cyberwise 4). API: behind a login or contract.
United States · Website scanned: catchprobe.com
- 7
Secrove
Overall score 5.3 (94th; same as Cyberwise). Scores are equal in the categories that could be compared.
Türkiye · Website scanned: secrove.com
- 8
Nebula
Overall score 5.3 (94th; same as Cyberwise). Scores are equal in the categories that could be compared.
Türkiye · Website scanned: nebulabilisim.com.tr
- 9
C-Prot
Overall score 5.3 (94th; same as Cyberwise). Scores are equal in the categories that could be compared.
Türkiye · Website scanned: c-prot.com
- 10
LastGuard
Overall score 2.6 (98th; 2.7 points below Cyberwise). Scores lower in attack surface management (2 vs Cyberwise 4).
Türkiye · Website scanned: lastguardsecurity.com
Cyberwise vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | Cyberwise | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 5.3 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 94th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | – | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | – | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | – | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | – | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | – | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | – | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | – | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 0 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 4 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | Türkiye | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | Türkiye-linked providers | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.