Hold Security alternatives 2026: 10 providers compared
Hold Security is a provider headquartered in the United States and was included in this comparison through The Infostealer Index 2026. Its overall score is 16.4 out of 100, ranking 67th among 100 providers.
- Published
- Scanned
- 3–4 November 2026
- Infostealer score source
- The Infostealer Index 2026, 12 October 2026
- Overall score and rank
- 16.4 / 100 · 67th of 100
- Infostealer
- 39.0 / 100 · 27th of 35
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · 54th of 98
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · 61st of 98
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · 28th of 98
- Attack surface management
- 0 / 10 · 81st of 98
- API
- 0 / 10 · No documentation found
- Country
- United States
- Selection source
- The Infostealer Index 2026
- Website scanned
- holdsecurity.com
Hold Security score profile
- Infostealer
- 39.0 / 100 · average 53.8
- Third-party risk
- 0 / 10 · average 2.8
- Phishing and brand protection
- 0 / 10 · average 3.7
- Executive protection
- 0 / 10 · average 1.6
- Attack surface management
- 0 / 10 · average 4.9
- API
- 0 / 10 · average 5.3
Each average is calculated from the providers measured in that category.
Hold Security ranks 67th among 100 providers with an overall score of 16.4, placing it in the lower half. It shares the same overall score with SOS Intelligence. The next score up belongs to LeakCheck (16.9, 0.5 points higher). The next score down belongs to TrySec, ReliaQuest, CYFIRMA and 4 more providers (15.8, 0.6 points lower).
Among the 34 providers selected through the same source (The Infostealer Index 2026), it ranks 32nd. The highest overall score in the group belongs to Bitsight (Cybersixgill) (72.3), 55.9 points above. Among the 31 providers headquartered in the United States it ranks 23rd; the closest scores in that list belong to CyCognito (18.4) and ReliaQuest (15.8).
Of its overall score of 16.4, 16.4 points come from infostealer, 0.0 from the four product categories and 0.0 from the API score; the largest share, 100%, comes from the infostealer score. It is one of 30 providers for which no API documentation was found.
Its infostealer score is 39.0, ranking 27th among the 35 providers with this score. Of the seven criteria, its highest score is in Infostealer focus (6 / 10; ranked 12th). Its lowest is in free access (1 / 10; ranked 28th). It is above the average on 1 of the seven criteria.
It does not score above the average of 98 providers in any of the four product categories. It falls furthest below the average in attack surface management: 0 / 10 against 4.9.
Its score distribution is closest to Farnsworth Intelligence: overall score 19.4, with the same score in 4 of the four categories.
Why look for alternatives
- Infostealer score 39.0; 26 providers score higher in this category.
- No capability was identified on the scanned pages in third-party risk, phishing and brand protection, executive protection and attack surface management.
- No API documentation was found on the website or in search results.
10 closest alternatives
The list is drawn from providers that score in Hold Security’s highest-scoring category (infostealer): the 3 with the highest overall score and the 7 whose overall score is closest to Hold Security.
- Dark Radar94.0
- Bitsight (Cybersixgill)72.3
- NordStellar69.9
- StealthMole22.0
- HackedList20.4
- Intelligence X19.8
- Farnsworth Intelligence19.4
- LeakCheck16.9
- Hold Security16.4
- SOS Intelligence16.4
- Kaduu13.9
- 1
Dark Radar
Overall score 94.0 (1st; 77.6 points above Hold Security). Scores higher than Hold Security in infostealer (98.2 vs Hold Security 39.0), third-party risk (9 vs Hold Security 0), phishing and brand protection (9 vs Hold Security 0), executive protection (9 vs Hold Security 0) and attack surface management (9 vs Hold Security 0). API: public documentation.
Türkiye · Website scanned: darkradar.com
- 2
Bitsight (Cybersixgill)
Overall score 72.3 (2nd; 55.9 points above Hold Security). Scores higher than Hold Security in infostealer (46.7 vs Hold Security 39.0), third-party risk (10 vs Hold Security 0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Hold Security 0), executive protection (8 vs Hold Security 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Hold Security 0). API: public documentation.
United States · Website scanned: bitsight.com
- 3
NordStellar
Overall score 69.9 (3rd; 53.5 points above Hold Security). Scores higher than Hold Security in infostealer (66.1 vs Hold Security 39.0), phishing and brand protection (10 vs Hold Security 0), executive protection (10 vs Hold Security 0) and attack surface management (8 vs Hold Security 0). API: public documentation.
Lithuania · Website scanned: nordstellar.com
- 4
StealthMole
Overall score 22.0 (46th; 5.6 points above Hold Security). Scores higher than Hold Security in infostealer (45.9 vs Hold Security 39.0). API: behind a login or contract.
Singapore · Website scanned: stealthmole.com
- 5
HackedList
Overall score 20.4 (56th; 4.0 points above Hold Security). Scores lower in infostealer (35.9 vs Hold Security 39.0). API: public documentation.
Czechia · Website scanned: hackedlist.io
- 6
Intelligence X
Overall score 19.8 (57th; 3.4 points above Hold Security). Scores lower in infostealer (34.6 vs Hold Security 39.0). API: public documentation.
Czechia · Website scanned: intelx.io
- 7
Farnsworth Intelligence
Overall score 19.4 (58th; 3.0 points above Hold Security). Scores higher than Hold Security in infostealer (46.0 vs Hold Security 39.0).
United States · Website scanned: farnsworthintelligence.com
- 8
LeakCheck
Overall score 16.9 (66th; 0.5 points above Hold Security). Scores lower in infostealer (27.7 vs Hold Security 39.0). API: public documentation.
United Kingdom · Website scanned: leakcheck.io
- 9
SOS Intelligence
Overall score 16.4 (67th; same as Hold Security). Scores lower in infostealer (32.8 vs Hold Security 39.0). API: behind a login or contract.
United Kingdom · Website scanned: sosintel.co.uk
- 10
Kaduu
Overall score 13.9 (76th; 2.5 points below Hold Security). Scores lower in infostealer (26.7 vs Hold Security 39.0). API: behind a login or contract.
Switzerland · Website scanned: kaduu.io
Hold Security vs Dark Radar, Bitsight (Cybersixgill) and NordStellar
| Criterion | Hold Security | Dark Radar | Bitsight (Cybersixgill) | NordStellar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 16.4 | 94.0 | 72.3 | 69.9 |
| Overall rank | 67th | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| Infostealer score | 39.0 | 98.2 | 46.7 | 66.1 |
| Infostealer focus (15%) | 6 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Device-level infection details (15%) | 2 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Employee, customer and supplier segmentation (12%) | 5 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Session cookie and token coverage (10%) | 2 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Collection timeliness (10%) | 6 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Published research (10%) | 5 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Free access (10%) | 1 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Third-party risk | 0 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
| Phishing and brand protection | 0 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Executive protection | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| Attack surface management | 0 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| API | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Country | United States | Türkiye | United States | Lithuania |
| Selection source | The Infostealer Index 2026 | Türkiye-linked providers | The Infostealer Index 2026 | The Infostealer Index 2026 |
Overall and infostealer scores are out of 100; criterion and category scores are out of 10. “–” means the component could not be measured.
Related pages
This comparison was prepared through web scanning and source review carried out with Claude Opus 5.5.